IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/e528f49e3e9f43c0a266aac04f3f433f.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Precision Gains from Publically Available School Proficiency Measures Compared to Study-Collected Test Scores in Education Cluster-Randomized Trials

Author

Listed:
  • John Deke
  • Lisa Dragoset
  • Ravaris Moore

Abstract

This paper compares the precision gains from adjusting impact estimates for student-level pretest scores (which can be costly to collect) with the gains associated with using publically available school-level proficiency data (available at low cost), using data from five large-scale randomized control trials conducted for the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • John Deke & Lisa Dragoset & Ravaris Moore, "undated". "Precision Gains from Publically Available School Proficiency Measures Compared to Study-Collected Test Scores in Education Cluster-Randomized Trials," Mathematica Policy Research Reports e528f49e3e9f43c0a266aac04, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:e528f49e3e9f43c0a266aac04f3f433f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/education/precisiongains.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shannon Monahan & Jaime Thomas & Dianne Paulsell & Lauren Murphy, "undated". "Learning about Infant and Toddler Early Education Services (LITES): A Systematic Review of the Evidence," Mathematica Policy Research Reports cfbc6dd280134471b144b4de8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Ira Nichols-Barrer & Nicholas Ingwersen & Camila Fernandez & Elena Moroz & Matt Sloan, "undated". "Evaluation Interim Report for the Georgia II Improving General Education Quality Project's School Rehabilitation and Training Activities," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 0ba19e2b66244ade9c38ff0ab, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Steven Glazerman & Hanley Chiang & Alison Wellington & Jill Constantine & Dan Player, "undated". "Impacts of Performance Pay Under the Teacher Incentive Fund: Study Design Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 0b5ad90028e54c259d54a1bf0, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. repec:mpr:mprres:7407 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:e528f49e3e9f43c0a266aac04f3f433f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.