IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/1edca1d13a1f48d0b480f495a1de5f96.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Transforming Teachers' Practice: The Impact of EL Education's English Language Arts Curriculum and Professional Learning on Teacher Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Choi
  • Scott Richman
  • Sarah Dolfin

Abstract

The widespread adoption of more rigorous state guidelines for student learning, such as the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), has led to tremendous interest in how best to prepare and develop teachers to foster the skills that students need to meet the new standards and succeed in college and careers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Choi & Scott Richman & Sarah Dolfin, "undated". "Transforming Teachers' Practice: The Impact of EL Education's English Language Arts Curriculum and Professional Learning on Teacher Practices," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 1edca1d13a1f48d0b480f495a, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:1edca1d13a1f48d0b480f495a1de5f96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/education/2017/if-teacher-practices.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scott Richman & Alicia Demers & Dmitriy Poznyak, "undated". "What Matters for Student Achievement? Exploring Teacher Instructional Practices and the Role of School-Level and Student-Level Characteristics," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 6fdaa5cad75c438c839b7c58c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Sarah Dolfin & Scott Richman & Jane Choi & Andrei Streke & Cheryl DeSaw & Alicia Demers & Dmitriy Poznyak, "undated". "Evaluation of the Teacher Potential Project," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 9962d3854795415d967d4e13b, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EL education; English language arts; teacher practices; professional learning;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:1edca1d13a1f48d0b480f495a1de5f96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.