IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/0a8644e3f3eb4fdfa041ceea77118264.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What Do Quality Rating Levels Mean? Examining the Implementation of QRIS Ratings to Inform Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Gretchen Kirby
  • Pia Caronongan
  • Lizabeth M. Malone
  • Kimberly Boller

Abstract

Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS) provide a summary quality rating for early care and education settings. This paper presents findings from an in-depth study that examined the specification of quality standards and implementation of the rating process in five QRIS.

Suggested Citation

  • Gretchen Kirby & Pia Caronongan & Lizabeth M. Malone & Kimberly Boller, 2015. "What Do Quality Rating Levels Mean? Examining the Implementation of QRIS Ratings to Inform Validation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 0a8644e3f3eb4fdfa041ceea7, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:0a8644e3f3eb4fdfa041ceea77118264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200614000878
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gretchen Kirby & Mariesa Herrmann & Clare Wolfendale & Andrea Mraz Esposito, "undated". "Moving On Up? Program Quality Ratings Under Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4186af174f204ba08e2c39b47, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Lindsay Fox & Moira McCullough & Pia Caronongan & Mariesa Herrmann, "undated". "Are Ratings from Tiered Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Valid Measures of Program Quality? A Synthesis of Validation Studies from Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge States," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 62a2330051e74a618dba170dc, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Gretchen Kirby & Pia Caronongan & Andrea Mraz Esposito & Lauren Murphy & Megan Shoji & Patricia Del Grosso & Wamaitha Kiambuthi & Melissa Clark & Lisa Dragoset, "undated". "Progress and Challenges in Developing Tiered Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (TQRIS) in the Round 1 Race to the Top-Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) States," Mathematica Policy Research Reports de8ae38d35ec4ce89e6b66d01, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:0a8644e3f3eb4fdfa041ceea77118264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.