IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mag/wpaper/110025.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Supply chain coordination by risk sharing contracts under random production yield and deterministic demand

Author

Listed:
  • Karl Inderfurth

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg)

  • Josephine Clemens

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg)

Abstract

From a large body of research studies we know that properly designed contracts can facilitate coordinated decision making of multiple actors in a supply chain (SC) so that efficiency losses for the SC as a whole can be avoided. In a newsvendor-type SC with stochastic demand it is well-known that due to the double marginalization effect a simple wholesale price contract will not achieve coordination. More complex contracts, however, do so, especially those which enable an appropriate sharing of risks between the SC actors. While the effectiveness of risk sharing contracts is well understood for SC situations with random demand and reliable supply, we do not know much about respective SC coordination problems if demand is deterministic, but supply is unreliable due to random production yield. For a buyer-supplier SC representing the latter SC setting, it is analyzed how the distribution of risks affects the coordination of buyer's ordering and supplier's production decision. In a basic random yield, deterministic demand setting both parties are exposed to risks of over-production or underdelivery, respectively, if a simple wholesale price contract is applied. The resulting risk distribution will always be such that SC coordination cannot be achieved. It can be shown, however, that two more sophisticated contract types with penalty and reward elements for the supplier can change the risk distribution in such a way that SC coordination is possible under random yield. Additionally, it is proved that also the wholesale price contract will guarantee SC coordination if the supplier has a second (emergency) procurement source at her disposal that is more costly, but reliable. Moreover, restricting oneself to wholesale price contracts it is shown that it can be beneficial to both parties to utilize this emergency source even if it is not profitable from a SC perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Inderfurth & Josephine Clemens, 2011. "Supply chain coordination by risk sharing contracts under random production yield and deterministic demand," FEMM Working Papers 110025, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:110025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fww.ovgu.de/fww_media/femm/femm_2011/2011_25.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Candace Arai Yano & Hau L. Lee, 1995. "Lot Sizing with Random Yields: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 311-334, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Parlane & Ying-Yi Tsai, 2014. "Optimal Sourcing Orders under Supply Disruptions and the Strategic Use of Buffer Suppliers," Working Papers 201417, School of Economics, University College Dublin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Voelkel, Michael A. & Sachs, Anna-Lena & Thonemann, Ulrich W., 2020. "An aggregation-based approximate dynamic programming approach for the periodic review model with random yield," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 286-298.
    2. Nathan Craig & Nicole DeHoratius & Ananth Raman, 2016. "The Impact of Supplier Inventory Service Level on Retailer Demand," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 461-474, October.
    3. Jan A. Van Mieghem & Nils Rudi, 2002. "Newsvendor Networks: Inventory Management and Capacity Investment with Discretionary Activities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 313-335, August.
    4. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lai, Hsing-Hua, 2017. "Capacity allocation with differentiated product demands under dual sourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 757-769.
    5. Pham, An & Jin, Tongdan & Novoa, Clara & Qin, Jin, 2019. "A multi-site production and microgrid planning model for net-zero energy operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 260-274.
    6. Song, Yuyue & Wang, Yunzeng, 2017. "Periodic review inventory systems with fixed order cost and uniform random yield," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 106-117.
    7. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    8. Grosfeld-Nir, Abraham & Anily, Shoshana & Ben-Zvi, Tal, 2006. "Lot-sizing two-echelon assembly systems with random yields and rigid demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(2), pages 600-616, September.
    9. Lilun Du & Qing Li, 2020. "A Data-Driven Approach to High-Volume Recruitment: Application to Student Admission," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 942-957, September.
    10. Kutzner, Sarah C. & Kiesmüller, Gudrun P., 2013. "Optimal control of an inventory-production system with state-dependent random yield," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 444-452.
    11. Saurabh Bansal & Mahesh Nagarajan, 2017. "Product Portfolio Management with Production Flexibility in Agribusiness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 914-930, August.
    12. Niu, Baozhuang & Ruan, Yiyuan & Yu, Xinhu, 2024. "Purchasing new for remanufacturing: Sourcing co-opetition, tax-planning and data validation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    13. A. Dolgui & M. Kovalyov & K. Shchamialiova, 2011. "Multi-product lot-sizing and sequencing on a single imperfect machine," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 465-482, December.
    14. Gullu, Refik, 1998. "Base stock policies for production/inventory problems with uncertain capacity levels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 43-51, February.
    15. Woonghee Tim Huh & Mahesh Nagarajan, 2010. "Technical note ---Linear Inflation Rules for the Random Yield Problem: Analysis and Computations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 244-251, February.
    16. Xiang Li & Yongjian Li, 2016. "On lot-sizing problem in a random yield production system under loss aversion," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 415-434, May.
    17. Xuanming Su, 2008. "Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 566-589, May.
    18. Ekin, Tahir, 2018. "Integrated maintenance and production planning with endogenous uncertain yield," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 52-61.
    19. Rana Azghandi & Jacqueline Griffin & Mohammad S. Jalali, 2018. "Minimization of Drug Shortages in Pharmaceutical Supply Chains: A Simulation-Based Analysis of Drug Recall Patterns and Inventory Policies," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, December.
    20. E A Silver, 2004. "An overview of heuristic solution methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 936-956, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Supply chain coordination; contracts; random yield; risk sharing; emergency procurement;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:110025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Guido Henkel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwmagde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.