IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kud/kuiedp/9018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bargaining Sets with Small Coalitions

Author

Listed:
  • Ulla Schjødt

    (Institute of Mathematics, University of Copenhagen)

  • Birgitte Sloth

    (Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen)

Abstract

The paper considers various cooperative equilibrium/solution concepts for atomless exchange economies. A famous result states that in such economies the core is equal to the set of Walrasian equilibria. We consider two arguments against using the core as solution concept in large economies: (1) A coalition will not block an allocation, if the agents fear that this will imply counterobjections from other coalitions, and there by result in an allocation which is worse than the original allocation. (2) A coalition will not block an allocation, if the coalition is too large to form. Each argument leads to definition of new solution concepts. (1) leads to the 'bargaining set' (two different definitions are considered in the paper) and (2) leads to 'the e-core'. We discuss these solution concepts and their relation to the core and the Walrasian equilibria. Then we try to define solution concepts taking both arguments into consideration. The results show that the bargaining set is not an equilibrium concept, but a concept demanding either equilibrium or 'no equilibria one step away', and that the bargaining set, in contrast to the core, is very sensible to the exact definition.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulla Schjødt & Birgitte Sloth, 1990. "Bargaining Sets with Small Coalitions," Discussion Papers 90-18, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:kud:kuiedp:9018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2015. "A bargaining-Walras approach for finite economies," MPRA Paper 69802, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2014. "On bargaining sets for finite economies," MPRA Paper 62303, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Jul 2014.
    3. Niccolò Urbinati, 2020. "Walrasian objection mechanism and Mas Colell's bargaining set in economies with many commodities," Working Papers 07, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    4. Javier Hervés-Estévez & Emma Moreno-García, 2015. "On restricted bargaining sets," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(3), pages 631-645, August.
    5. Niccolò Urbinati, 2023. "The Walrasian objection mechanism and Mas-Colell’s bargaining set in economies with many commodities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 76(1), pages 45-68, July.
    6. Hervés-Beloso, Carlos & Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2018. "Bargaining sets in finite economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 93-98.
    7. Maria Gabriella Graziano & Marialaura Pesce & Niccolo Urbinati, 2023. "The Equitable Bargaining Set," CSEF Working Papers 676, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    8. Bhowmik, Anuj & Saha, Sandipan, 2023. "Restricted bargaining sets in a club economy," MPRA Paper 119210, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2012. "Some remarks on restricted bargaining sets," MPRA Paper 39385, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jun 2012.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bargaining; coalition; game theory and bargaining theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kud:kuiedp:9018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Hoffmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/okokudk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.