IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kei/dpaper/2011-020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

New Methods for Testing the Sustainability of Government Debt

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuki Hiraga

    (Faculty of Economics, Keio University)

Abstract

Recently, several countries, which include not only developing, but also developed ones, face the severe sovereign crisis. In this circumstance, we introduce the new method for testing the sustainability of government debt. Previous studies which investigate the sustainability of government debt satisfies or not to test the Transversality condition of government debt. But, these studies are criticized by Bohn (1998, 2008) as "ad-hoc" sustainability, because the situation which satisfies transversality condition (in other words, the intertemporal government budget constraint is bind) is merely chance. Bohn (1998, 2008) suggest the sufficiency condition which satisfies the sustainability of government debt if the debt stabilization rule of government debt and primary surplus is satisfied. But, we do not know whether the government debt is really sustainable, at least in view of "Locally Ricardian" which Woodford suggests. Therefore we connect these discussions to apply the covariate augmented Dickey-Fuller (CADF) test to the government debt, and check whether the government debt is unit root or not using U.S data. Moreover, we apply the estimation method Hamilton and Flavin (1986) with covariates to check whether "Globally Ricardian" is really satisfied. In our results, U.S cannot obtain the sustainability at all time, even if the policy stabilization rule a la Bohn (1998, 2008) is satisfied. We show the sustainability rule is not sufficient condition empirically. On the other hand, "Globally Ricardian" is satisfied, and then the result is consistent with Woodford (1995, 1998).

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuki Hiraga, 2011. "New Methods for Testing the Sustainability of Government Debt," Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Discussion Paper Series 2011-020, Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Program.
    • Handle: RePEc:kei:dpaper:2011-020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ies.keio.ac.jp/old_project/old/gcoe-econbus/pdf/dp/DP2011-020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fossati, Sebastian, 2012. "Covariate unit root tests with good size and power," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3070-3079.
    2. Woodford, Michael, 1995. "Price-level determinacy without control of a monetary aggregate," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-46, December.
    3. Henning Bohn, 1998. "The Behavior of U. S. Public Debt and Deficits," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 113(3), pages 949-963.
    4. Chalk, Nigel A., 2000. "The sustainability of bond-financed deficits: An overlapping generations approach," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 293-328, April.
    5. Elliott, Graham & Jansson, Michael, 2002. "Testing for Unit Roots with Stationary Covariates," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt4v35s2gv, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    6. Bohn, Henning, 1995. "The Sustainability of Budget Deficits in a Stochastic Economy," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 27(1), pages 257-271, February.
    7. Elliott, Graham & Jansson, Michael, 2000. "Testing for Unit Roots with Stationary Covariances," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt47k7z69n, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    8. Elliott, Graham & Jansson, Michael, 2003. "Testing for unit roots with stationary covariates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 75-89, July.
    9. Elliott, Graham & Jansson, Michael, 2002. "Testing for Unit Roots with Stationary Covariates," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt4v35s2gv, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    10. Hansen, Bruce E., 1995. "Rethinking the Univariate Approach to Unit Root Testing: Using Covariates to Increase Power," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(5), pages 1148-1171, October.
    11. Elliott, Graham & Jansson, Michael, 2000. "Testing for Unit Roots with Stationary Covariances," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt47k7z69n, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    12. Jomana Amara & David Papell, 2006. "Testing for Purchasing Power Parity using stationary covariates," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1-2), pages 29-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsong, Ching-Chuan & Wu, Chien-Wei & Chiu, Hsien-Hung & Lee, Cheng-Feng, 2013. "Covariate unit root tests under structural change and asymmetric STAR dynamics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 101-112.
    2. Mauro Costantini & Claudio Lupi, 2013. "A Simple Panel-CADF Test for Unit Roots," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 75(2), pages 276-296, April.
    3. Ching-Chuan Tsong & Cheng-Feng Lee, 2013. "Further Evidence On Real Interest Rate Equalization: Panel Information, Non-Linearities And Structural Changes," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65, pages 85-105, May.
    4. Cheng-Feng Lee & Ching-Chuan Tsong, 2013. "Bootstrapping Covariate Unit Root Tests: An Application To Inflation Rates," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65, pages 165-174, May.
    5. Sebastian Fossati, 2013. "Unit root testing with stationary covariates and a structural break in the trend function," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 368-384, May.
    6. Tsong, Ching-Chuan, 2011. "Testing for a unit root with covariates against nonlinear alternatives," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 1226-1234, May.
    7. Cláudia Duarte, 2015. "Covariate-augmented unit root tests with mixed-frequency data," Working Papers w201507, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    8. Fossati, Sebastian, 2012. "Covariate unit root tests with good size and power," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3070-3079.
    9. Ching-Chuan Tsong, 2010. "Are Real Exchange Rates Mean Reverting in Developing Economies in Asia? A Covariate Stationarity Approach," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 397-412.
    10. Eiji Kurozumi & Daisuke Yamazaki & Kaddour Hadri, 2012. "Covariate Unit Root Test for Cross-Sectionally Dependent Panel Data," Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series gd12-256, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    11. Lee, Cheng-Feng & Hu, Te-Chung & Li, Ping-Cheng & Tsong, Ching-Chuan, 2013. "Asymmetric behavior of unemployment rates: Evidence from the quantile covariate unit root test," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 72-84.
    12. Kaddour Hadri & Eiji Kurozumi & Daisuke Yamazaki, 2015. "Synergy between an Improved Covariate Unit Root Test and Cross-sectionally Dependent Panel Data Unit Root Tests," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 83(6), pages 676-700, December.
    13. Cheng-Feng Lee & Ching-Chuan Tsong, 2011. "Covariate selection for testing purchasing power parity," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(15), pages 1923-1933.
    14. Lupi, Claudio, 2009. "Unit Root CADF Testing with R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 32(i02).
    15. Galvao Jr., Antonio F., 2009. "Unit root quantile autoregression testing using covariates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 165-178, October.
    16. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Vanessa Smith, L. & Yamagata, Takashi, 2013. "Panel unit root tests in the presence of a multifactor error structure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 94-115.
    17. Joakim Westerlund, 2013. "A computationally convenient unit root test with covariates, conditional heteroskedasticity and efficient detrending," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 477-495, July.
    18. Lawrence J. Christiano & Martin S. Eichenbaum & Robert J. Vigfusson, 2003. "How do Canadian hours worked respond to a technology shock?," International Finance Discussion Papers 774, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    19. Aristidou Chrystalleni & Harvey David I. & Leybourne Stephen J., 2017. "The Impact of the Initial Condition on Covariate Augmented Unit Root Tests," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Christopoulos, Dimitris K. & León-Ledesma, Miguel A., 2008. "Time-series output convergence tests and stationary covariates," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 297-299, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kei:dpaper:2011-020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Global COE Program Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekeijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.