IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ita/itaman/06_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Medien- und Telekommunikationspolitik: Unordnung durch Konvergenz – Ordnung durch Mediamatikpolitik

Author

Listed:
  • Latzer, Michael

Abstract

Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts wird ein Kernstück des über viele Jahrzehnte hinweg gelehrten und praktizierten Ordnungsmodells im Kommunikationssektor brüchig: Die technikorientierte Unterteilung in Medien und Telekommunikation, in Individual- und Massenkommunikation, die sich in unterschiedlichen Regulierungsmodellen und in getrennten politischen Zuständigkeiten für Medienpolitik einerseits und Telekommunikationspolitik andererseits manifestiert. Das Internet ist das Symbol der als Konvergenz bezeichneten Disruption in Politik und Analyse, aber gleichzeitig nur die Spitze des Eisberges, auf den das schwer manövrierbare Regulierungssystem aufgelaufen ist. Seither wird an der Schadensbegrenzung und an einem neuen Kurs der Kommunikationspolitik gearbeitet. Das reformierte Ordnungsmodell soll dem durch Konvergenz veränderten Kommunikationssystem, der Mediamatik, gerecht werden. Der Beitrag zeichnet vorerst die Genese und Grundzüge der traditionellen Ordnungsmodelle der Medien-und Telekommunikationspolitik nach und thematisiert das Verhältnis von Kommunikationswissenschaft und Politik (Abschnitt 1). Anschließend wird die durch Konvergenz verursachte Unordnung in Wirtschaft, Politik und Wissenschaft herausgearbeitet (Abschnitt 2). Die Analyse von Reformvorschlägen und Reformschritten in Reaktion auf den Konvergenztrend verdeutlicht die Grundzüge einer Neuordnung. Sie wird mittels einer integrierten Mediamatikpolitik angestrebt, die den Sektor nicht mehr vertikal nach technologischen Kriterien oder Industriegruppenzugehörigkeit unterteilt (Abschnitt 3). Im Resümee wird auf den möglichen Bedeutungsgewinn kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Forschung für eine integrierte Mediamatikpolitik hingewiesen (Abschnitt 4).

Suggested Citation

  • Latzer, Michael, 2006. "Medien- und Telekommunikationspolitik: Unordnung durch Konvergenz – Ordnung durch Mediamatikpolitik," ITA manu:scripts 06_01, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ita:itaman:06_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-manuscript/ita_06_01.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Irene, 2004. "Canada, South Korea, Netherlands and Sweden: regulatory implications of the convergence of telecommunications, broadcasting and Internet services," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 79-96, February.
    2. Garcia-Murillo, Martha A. & MacInnes, Ian, 2001. "FCC organizational structure and regulatory convergence," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 431-452, July.
    3. Simpson, Seamus, 0. "Universal service issues in converging communications environments: the case of the UK," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(3-4), pages 233-248, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nagler Matthew G., 2007. "Understanding the Internet's Relevance to Media Ownership Policy: A Model of Too Many Choices," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, June.
    2. Yamakawa, Peter & Cadillo, Gloria & Tornero, Rubén, 2012. "Critical factors for the expansion of broadband in developing countries: The case of Peru," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 560-570.
    3. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Jing Chen, 2017. "Exploring Performance Determinants of China’s Cable Operators and OTT Service Providers in the Era of Digital Convergence—From the Perspective of an Industry Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Machiel van Dijk & Machiel Mulder, 2005. "Regulation of telecommunication and deployment of broadband," CPB Memorandum 131, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    5. Lin, Mao-Shong & Wu, Feng-Shang, 2013. "Identifying the determinants of broadband adoption by diffusion stage in OECD countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 241-251.
    6. Rajabiun, Reza & Middleton, Catherine A., 2013. "Multilevel governance and broadband infrastructure development: Evidence from Canada," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 702-714.
    7. Hasbi, Maude, 2015. "Universal service obligations and public payphone use: Is regulation still necessary in the era of mobile telephony?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 421-435.
    8. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2024. "Exploring killer domains to create new value: A comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4).
    9. Haucap, Justus & Heimeshoff, Ulrich & Lange, Mirjam R. J., 2014. "The impact of tariff diversity on broadband diffusion: An empirical analysis," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101403, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. Gulati, Girish J. & Yates, David J., 2012. "Different paths to universal access: The impact of policy and regulation on broadband diffusion in the developed and developing worlds," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 749-761.
    11. Hultkrantz, Lars, 2005. "A review of universal-service policy," Working Papers 2005:5, Örebro University, School of Business.
    12. Hou, Liyang & Valcke, Peggy & Stevens, David, 2013. "Can open internet access be imposed upon European CATV networks?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 970-980.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Medienpolitik; Telekommunikationspolitik; Konvergenz; Governance; Regulierung; Mediamatik;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ita:itaman:06_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Werner Kabelka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ioeawat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.