IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/202403062012060000.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Tale of Two Supreme Court Rulings on Indian Affirmative Action

Author

Listed:
  • Aygün, Orhan
  • Turhan, Bertan

Abstract

India has implemented a complex affirmative action via a reservation system since the 1950s. In the historic case Indra Shawney vs. Union of India (1992), the judgment formulated three principles for reservation policy to respect. In another historic case, Ashoka Kumar Thakur vs. Union of India (2008) (AKT), the Supreme Court of India (SCI) mandated a 27 percent reservation to the Other Backward Classes (OBC). It recommended two directives without defining a procedural framework. The first one suggests implementing the OBC reservation as a soft reserve. The second one advises a maximum of 10 points difference between the cutoff scores of OBC and the open category to maintain the standard of excellence. We show that the two directives in AKT conflict with India's fundamental mandates from Indra Shawney (1992) in the sense that no choice rule can implement them concurrently. The incompatibility is resolved by either dropping the AKT directives on de-reservation or weakening the directive on eligibility. We propose path-independent assignment rules in each case.

Suggested Citation

  • Aygün, Orhan & Turhan, Bertan, 2024. "A Tale of Two Supreme Court Rulings on Indian Affirmative Action," ISU General Staff Papers 202403062012060000, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:202403062012060000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/377e7e1a-8805-4371-b63d-be60b4a5acc5/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orhan Aygün & Bertan Turhan, 2023. "How to De-Reserve Reserves: Admissions to Technical Colleges in India," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(10), pages 6147-6164, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustafa Oğuz Afacan & Inácio Bó & Bertan Turhan, 2023. "Assignment maximization," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 25(1), pages 123-138, February.
    2. Orhan Aygün & Bertan Turhan, 2023. "Priority design for engineering colleges in India," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 5-15, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:202403062012060000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.