IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/200710010700001260.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating Consumers' Valuation of Organic and Cosmetically Damaged Apples

Author

Listed:
  • Yue, Chenyan
  • Jensen, Helen H.
  • Mueller, Daren S.
  • Nonnecke, Gail R.
  • Bonnet, Douglas
  • Gleason, Mark L.

Abstract

The sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS) disease complex causes cosmetic damage but does not affect the safety or eating quality of apples. Treatment for disease is more difficult and costly for organic producers, and consumers' willingness to pay for organic apples needs to be considered in growers' choice of production technologies. A mixed probit model was applied to survey data to evaluate consumers' willingness to buy apples. The results show consumers will pay a premium for organic production methods and for apples with low amounts of SBFS damage. Behavioral variables such as experience growing fruit significantly affect the willingness to buy apples of different damage levels. Consumers have limited tolerance of very blemished apples and trade off production technology attributes for cosmetic appearance. Better understanding of this tradeoff can improve organic producers' decisions about disease control.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue, Chenyan & Jensen, Helen H. & Mueller, Daren S. & Nonnecke, Gail R. & Bonnet, Douglas & Gleason, Mark L., 2007. "Estimating Consumers' Valuation of Organic and Cosmetically Damaged Apples," ISU General Staff Papers 200710010700001260, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:200710010700001260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/5a148c6b-ce29-4e2d-adf0-62ff9e463511/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:200710010700001260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.