IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/199105010700001221.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing Pork Production Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Kliebenstein, James
  • Hillburn, Chris

Abstract

Contract pork production is receiving increased attention. In a Pork '89'article. Rhodes estimated that "at most, a little less than 10 percent of the hogs in the United States are produced under contract."' This level is now likely 12-14 percent of all hogs.' *A Pork '90 article described the typical contract producer as one about 40 years of age and has produced hogs'for about 12 years. The contractor was generally happy with the contract program and had &iished pigs for the current contractor for over 2 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Kliebenstein, James & Hillburn, Chris, 1991. "Comparing Pork Production Contracts," ISU General Staff Papers 199105010700001221, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199105010700001221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/e334b5fb-fe8b-401a-88b0-6c3ec1593b63/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Eidman, Vernon R., 1998. "The Effect Of Risk And Autonomy On Independent Hog Producers' Contracting Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199105010700001221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.