IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc93431.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Monitoring and Assessment Framework for the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (MAFEIP) Second report on outcome indicators

Author

Listed:

Abstract

To refine the initial monitoring framework, and in the absence of reference data, the previous deliverable (MAFEIP First report on outcome indicators) reported on a joint review of several sources of information available up until November 2013 which provided insight into the use of outcome indicators and which were either directly or closely related to the activities undertaken by the EIP on AHA commitments, namely: The 2012 data that shaped the initial monitoring framework The data from 71 good practices submitted by EIP on AHA Reference Sites And the data from good practices of EIP on AHA Action Groups A1, A3, B3 and D4 This deliverable takes the work one step further whilst analysing data that has become available in February-April 2014 through a survey on outcome indicators answered by Action Group commitments. More concretely, for each Action Group we have not just considered the importance or recurrence of each indicator, starting from the common primary indicators, and continuing with the common secondary indicators, but also overlaps between them, so as to determine the share of commitments that are not measuring primary indicators and for which one would have to rely only on secondary indicators. We further checked the relevance of specific secondary indicators according to the survey so as to confirm inclusion or exclusion of these indicators. Finally for the sustainability column, we confirmed through the data from the survey the type of resources used as measured by commitments (as much as this was possible from the very limited data available).

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Boehler & Fabienne Abadie & Ramon Sabes-Figuera, 2014. "Monitoring and Assessment Framework for the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (MAFEIP) Second report on outcome indicators," JRC Research Reports JRC93431, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc93431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93431
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Boehler & Fabienne Abadie, 2016. "Monitoring and Assessment Framework for the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (MAFEIP) - Gap analysis," JRC Research Reports JRC101550, Joint Research Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EIP; Active and Healthy Ageing; EIP on AHA; indicators; monitoring; framework;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc93431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.