IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc85927.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (20122013) Country reports

Author

Listed:

Abstract

A widespread uptake of eHealth technologies is likely to benefit European Healthcare systems both in terms of quality of care and financial sustainability and European society at large. This is why eHealth has been on the European Commission policy agenda for more than a decade. The objectives of the latest eHealth action plan developed in 2012 are in line with those of the Europe 2020 Strategy and the Digital Agenda for Europe. This report, based on the analysis of the data from the "European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (20122013)" project, presents policy relevant results and findings for each of the 28 EU Member States as well as Iceland and Norway. The results highlighted here are based on the analysis of the survey descriptive results as well as two composite indicators on eHealth deployment and eHealth availability and use that were developed based on the survey's data.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramon Sabes-Figuera, 2013. "European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (20122013) Country reports," JRC Research Reports JRC85927, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc85927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC85927
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melchiorre, Maria Gabriella & Papa, Roberta & Rijken, Mieke & van Ginneken, Ewout & Hujala, Anneli & Barbabella, Francesco, 2018. "eHealth in integrated care programs for people with multimorbidity in Europe: Insights from the ICARE4EU project," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 53-63.
    2. Maria Gabriella Melchiorre & Giovanni Lamura & Francesco Barbabella & on behalf of ICARE4EU Consortium, 2018. "eHealth for people with multimorbidity: Results from the ICARE4EU project and insights from the “10 e’s” by Gunther Eysenbach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Reif Simon & Bolz Theresa & Karamik Yasemin, 2024. "Produktivitätsparadoxon der Digitalisierung im Krankenhaus – auf der Suche nach effizienzsteigernden Innovationen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 104(9), pages 599-602.
    4. Marina Van Geenhuizen & Sander Faber, 2015. "ICT adoption factors in medical hospitals: a European perspective and focus on The Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa15p590, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Paul J.J. Welfens, 2016. "eHealth: Grundlagen der Digitalen Gesundheitswirtschaft und Leitmarktperspektiven," EIIW Discussion paper disbei227, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    6. Ardielli Eva, 2020. "Evaluation of eHealth Deployment at Primary Care in the EU Member States by Usage of Selected MCDM Methods," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 20(3), pages 337-359, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Hospital Survey; EHS; synthesis; outcomes; eHealth; deployment; availability; use; EHR; information exchange; infrastructure; composite; indicators; policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc85927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.