Author
Abstract
Starting in 2025, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) will strengthen disclosure practices for company transition plans. These plans detail the contribution of corporates to the transition to a sustainable economy. In the meantime, credible transition plans have already become one of the key tools for companies to raise transition finance, as defined in Commission Recommendation (EU) 2023/1425. They are also expected to deliver highly valuable data serving different purposes –from strategy to risk management– and various stakeholders –from financial institutions to policymakers. Defining an EU Transition Plan Credibility Assessment Framework is therefore an opportunity to support the market, and may inform the definition and tracking of transition finance. The JRC has developed two tools –assessment questions and assessment KPIs– to assess specific determinants of a transition plan's credibility: geographical dependencies at asset-level (e.g. availability of resources, policy context) and how those dependencies are addressed. These assessment questions and KPIs may be used by companies to increase the credibility of their transition plan, by financial institutions to assess the credibility of companies’ transition plans and by policymakers to inform public policy and financing. Analysing the geographical dependencies of company transition plans in energy-intensive industries can inform stakeholder dialogues and infrastructure investments on the ground at EU, Member States and regional level. Territorial knowledge should be part of the design of industrial policy that is fit for the Clean Industrial deal, as it enhances public-private partnerships and multi-level governance.
Suggested Citation
PICKARD GARCIA Nicolas & GOURDON Thomas & SEIGNEUR Isabelle & MARTINY Alice & ARRANZ PADILLA Maria & BELTRAN MIRALLES Manuel & GUERREIRO MIGUEL Mecia, 2024.
"Credible company transition plans for climate change mitigation: a geographical dependency assessment,"
JRC Research Reports
JRC139084, Joint Research Centre.
Handle:
RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc139084
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc139084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.