Author
Abstract
This report presents the results of a feasibility study of the European Digital Skills Certificate (EDSC), as Action 9 of the Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027). The study reflects the results of a year-long series of consultation activities that have engaged a wide range of stakeholders. Stakeholders see the EDSC as a Quality Label for existing digital skills certifications rather than a European Certificate in its own right. Certification providers would then have the possibility to obtain the EDSC Quality Label through an accreditation process. The EDSC Quality Label would entail a framework of requirements and recommendations that certification providers would comply with, within a governance structure. The evidence of this study shows that, in spite of the broad set of potential benefits and added value that a trusted European Quality Label on digital skills certificates could bring, the demand for an EDSC in the EU is limited. In particular, for employers and certificate holders, while their low participation limited the study’s capacity to fully assess their need, the data collected from these actors shows a low level of demand. This is further confirmed by a majority of stakeholders pointing to the lack of demand from employers and education and training institutions as a key challenge for the implementation of an EDSC. An additional challenge reported is the insufficient provision of education and training on digital skills. Furthermore, the study has identified a varied but overall moderate level of readiness for an EDSC across Member States indicating that substantial effort would be needed to implement and reap the benefits from an EDSC. The feasibility analysis explored technical considerations for each requirement and recommendation defining the EDSC Quality Label, drew a cost-benefit analysis, examined a potential governance structure and outlined the possible building blocks for its implementation. The analysis shows that the model that emerged from the study for an EDSC would entail significant implementation and permanent operational costs. In addition, the development of a broad set of actions or building blocks for the EDSC to deliver its expected benefits would be needed, including, among others, the setting up of a supporting policy framework, the development of a relevant education and training offer available and accessible to all citizens, the setting up of a governance structure and of an accreditation system for certification providers, the availability of EDSC accredited certification schemes across EU Member States, awareness raising and communication actions among stakeholders, and a detailed understanding of the demand for digital skill certificates with an EDSC Quality Label. Considering that employers and certificate holders constitute key actors for the adoption of an EDSC and show a low level of demand, the overall moderate level of readiness for an EDSC across Member States, and, the complexity of its implementation, at this stage, the costs of putting in place an EDSC Quality label, based on the gathered evidence, would outweigh its benefits.
Suggested Citation
CENTENO Clara & COSGROVE Judith & CACHIA Romina & MORA Tatiana & DI LEGGE Angelo & VIVARELLI Serena & BULIAN Giacomo & MOYES PRELLEZO Nuria & PIÑA DE SANTISTEBAN Paula & SCHULZ Carola & HÜSING Tobias , 2024.
"European Digital Skills Certificate (EDSC) Feasibility Study,"
JRC Research Reports
JRC138344, Joint Research Centre.
Handle:
RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc138344
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc138344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.