IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc131863.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Background report to the guide for the use of the EU Ecolabel

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Green public procurement (GPP) is a powerful tool to achieve environmental objectives by means of the incorporation of green requirements into public sector purchasing contracts. Public authorities, by promoting “green” purchases, incentivise environmentally beneficial outcomes and foster market innovation as well as the transformation towards a sustainable economy model. In order to “green” the market, it is essential for producers to be able to make certifiable and credible green claims about their products and for customers to know what to ask for. While the EU Ecolabel policy can provide environmental references or standards in relation to green claims on products, the EU GPP policy can help customers to know what to ask for. The EU GPP recommendations placed in this document are based on the EU Ecolabel criteria and intend to provide authorities with guidance on how to use ecolabels, and in particular the EU Ecolabel, in the procurement process. This report aims to bring these two policies together in order to find synergies between the supply-side EU Ecolabel policy and the demand-side EU GPP policy – specifically for the procurement of hard covering products made of natural stone, agglomerated stone, ceramics/fired clay or precast concrete. In addition to a brief introduction to the EU Ecolabel policy, to the EU GPP policy and to procurement procedures as a whole, research is presented to support JRC recommendations to public procurers about exactly what green criteria to set when trying to procure environmentally friendly hard covering products. The recommended environmental criteria are split into three themes that focus on: (i) energy consumption and CO2 emissions (different approaches for sub-products made with and without combustion processes); (ii) emissions to air (dust and, where relevant, SOx, NOx and HF), and (iii) process waste reuse at the production site (different benchmarks for different sub-products). Where relevant, further information about the why the EU Ecolabel criteria are relevant and what other ISO 14024 type I ecolabels may be considered as equivalent is provided. This builds up upon the work that concluded with the adoption of the EU Ecolabel criteria, project that was also led by the JRC and finalised in 2021.

Suggested Citation

  • DONATELLO Shane & PEREZ CAMACHO M Nati & WOLF Oliver, 2024. "Background report to the guide for the use of the EU Ecolabel," JRC Research Reports JRC131863, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc131863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC131863
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc131863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.