IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iob/wpaper/201601.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In need of a guardian angel: preserving the gains of the Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement for Burundi

Author

Listed:
  • Vandeginste, Stef

Abstract

The Arusha Agreement of 28 August 2000 is an important stake of the ongoing crisis in Burundi. This paper analyses Burundi’s Arusha Agreement based achievements and suggests how they may be better protected through existing but strengthened institutional mechanisms. A political agreement of a hybrid nature, the Arusha Agreement contains a set of constitutional principles that have strongly inspired the current Constitution of 18 March 2005. The legal status of Protocol II of the Arusha Agreement has been recognised by the Constitutional Court, but its precise constitutional or supra-constitutional status needs to be further clarified. Furthermore, its enforcement of this text should not merely depend on a conjunctural political support. Two protection mechanisms, one political the other judicial, can ensure its respect. The Senate as well the Constitutional Court should be studied in more detail in order to reinforce their role as guardian angels of the Arusha Agreement. This paper intends to offer inspiration for that study and suggests some amendments of the powers of the Constitutional Court.

Suggested Citation

  • Vandeginste, Stef, 2016. "In need of a guardian angel: preserving the gains of the Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement for Burundi," IOB Working Papers 2016.01, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    • Handle: RePEc:iob:wpaper:201601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://medialibrary.uantwerpen.be/oldcontent/container2673/files/Publications/WP/2016/01-Vandeginste.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandeginste, Stef, 2014. "La limitation constitutionnelle du nombre de mandats présidentiels: une coquille vide? Une analyse du cas du Burundi," IOB Working Papers 2014.04, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    2. Vandeginste, Stef, 2015. "Arusha at 15: reflections on power-sharing, peace and transition in Burundi," IOB Discussion Papers 2015.01, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    3. Vandeginste, Stef, 2006. "Théorie consociative et partage du pouvoir au Burundi," IOB Discussion Papers 2006.04, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Benoit Falisse & Hugues Nkengurutse, 2022. "Citizens Committees and Local Elites: Elite Capture, Captured Elites, and Absent Elites in Health Facility Committees," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(3), pages 1662-1683, June.
    2. Stef Vandeginste, 2009. "Power-Sharing, Conflict and Transition in Burundi: Twenty Years of Trial and Error," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 44(3), pages 63-86.
    3. Banshimiyubusa, Denis, 2022. "Crispations identitaires et "identités légitimatrices" pendant crise politique: un regard rétrospectif sur la crise du 3ème mandat au Burundi," IOB Discussion Papers 2022.01, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    4. Devon E.A. Curtis, 2015. "Development assistance and the lasting legacies of rebellion in Burundi and Rwanda," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 1365-1381, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Burundi; Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iob:wpaper:201601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hans De Backer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iobuabe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.