IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/14717.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative analysis of sustainability related disclosure frameworks: SFDR, IFC PS, and BRSR

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Garg
  • Kruti Upadhyay
  • Sanjay Kumar Jain

Abstract

This study is an attempt to compare and contrast the existing sustainability-related frameworks – Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulations (SFDR) introduced by the European Union, Business responsibility and sustainability reporting (BRSR) introduced by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the International Finance Corporation Performance Standards (IFC PS) developed by the International Finance Corporation. The content analysis method has been employed to gain an in-depth understanding of the indicators included in these frameworks. Our key findings suggest that SFDR is the most comprehensive of the three frameworks considered. The BRSR framework stops at the disclosures related to the business itself. However, the IFC PS is the most adaptable as compared to the other two frameworks considered for this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Garg & Kruti Upadhyay & Sanjay Kumar Jain, 2024. "Comparative analysis of sustainability related disclosure frameworks: SFDR, IFC PS, and BRSR," IIMA Working Papers WP 2024-10-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/2024-10/WP-2024-10-01_0.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.