IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iik/wpaper/187.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender Perceptions and Organisational Climate: A Study of Two Structurally Different Large Organisations in India

Author

Listed:
  • Manish Kumar

    (Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode)

  • Hemang Jauhari

    (IIM Lucknow)

  • Rani S Ladha

    (Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode)

  • Niti Shekhar

    (Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode)

Abstract

In this study we observe the gender differences pertaining to perception of organizational climate. We have demonstrated that the perception of female employees in organized sector in India may no longer be restricted to feelings of despair and loss of hope as against what has been mostly the discourse at the national and international levels. We have demonstrated that these perceptions may not only be homogenous across organizations (i.e., socially determined) but in fact may also depend on the organizational structural contexts. Gender perceptions on identification and goal clarity were determined by larger social context as irrespective of the organization the mean scores of women respondents were significantly lower than those of male respondents. Women participants were perceived by their supervisors to indulge less in deviant behavior as compared to male participants. However, gender perceptions regarding perceived climate of welfare measures, outward focus of the organization, and fairness were contingent on the structural context of the two organizations in which our study was conducted. The two organizations differed significantly in their human resources practices. Although limited in generalizability, the study incorporated a robust study design in the two large organizations; one a government utility and the other a private sector organization. Both the organizations had more than 10000 employees on their roles. We analyzed 545 responses from the government utility and 8853 responses from the private organization. Our findings may help managers understand the differences in the socially constructed perception of intervention mechanisms by men and women. This perception is further influenced by the organizational structure and norms. Managers could thus institute processes and procedures in ways which balance the needs of both genders.

Suggested Citation

  • Manish Kumar & Hemang Jauhari & Rani S Ladha & Niti Shekhar, 2015. "Gender Perceptions and Organisational Climate: A Study of Two Structurally Different Large Organisations in India," Working papers 187, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
  • Handle: RePEc:iik:wpaper:187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iimk.ac.in/websiteadmin/FacultyPublications/Working%20Papers/187fullp.pdf?t=58
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther Duflo, 2012. "Women Empowerment and Economic Development," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1051-1079, December.
    2. Niharika Doble & M.V. Supriya, 2010. "Gender Differences in the Perception of Work-Life Balance," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 5(4), pages 331-342.
    3. Candida G. Brush, 1992. "Research on Women Business Owners: Past Trends, a New Perspective and Future Directions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(4), pages 5-30, July.
    4. Laura Serviere-Munoz & Anshu Saran, 2012. "Market Orientation, Innovation, And Dynamism From An Ownership And Gender Approach: Evidence From Mexico," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17.
    5. World Bank, 2012. "World Development Report 2012 [Rapport sur le développement dans le monde 2012]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 4391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felix Meier Zu Selhausen & Jacob Weisdorf, 2016. "A colonial legacy of African gender inequality? Evidence from Christian Kampala, 1895–2011," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 69(1), pages 229-257, February.
    2. Clare Shamier & Katharine McKinnon & Kerry Woodward, 2021. "Social Relations, Gender and Empowerment in Economic Development: Flores, Nusa Tenggara Timur," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(6), pages 1396-1417, November.
    3. Jacobus Hoop & Patrick Premand & Furio Rosati & Renos Vakis, 2018. "Women’s economic capacity and children’s human capital accumulation," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 453-481, April.
    4. Ghani,Syed Ejaz & Grover,Arti & Kerr,Sari & Kerr,William Robert, 2016. "Will market competition trump gender discrimination in India ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7814, The World Bank.
    5. Elisabetta Lodigiani & Sara Salomone, 2015. "Migration-induced Transfers of Norms. Political Empowerment?The case of Female Political Empowerment," Working Papers 2015:19, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    6. Baliamoune–Lutz, Mina & McGillivray, Mark, 2015. "The impact of gender inequality in education on income in Africa and the Middle East," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Kotsadam, Andreas & Tolonen, Anja, 2016. "African Mining, Gender, and Local Employment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 325-339.
    8. Nadir Altinok & Abdurrahman Aydemir, 2015. "The Unfolding of Gender Gap in Education," Working Papers halshs-01204805, HAL.
    9. Sonali Das & Ms. Sonali Jain-Chandra & Ms. Kalpana Kochhar & Naresh Kumar, 2015. "Women Workers in India: Why So Few Among So Many?," IMF Working Papers 2015/055, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Ummad Mazhar, 2021. "Women empowerment and insecurity: firm-level evidence," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 43-53, January.
    11. Tendai Zawaira & Matthew Clance & Carolyn Chisadza & Rangan Gupta, 2021. "Financial Inclusion and Gender Inequality in sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 202167, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    12. International Monetary Fund, 2016. "Pakistan: Selected Issues Paper," IMF Staff Country Reports 2016/002, International Monetary Fund.
    13. Paudel, Jayash & de Araujo, Pedro, 2017. "Demographic responses to a political transformation: Evidence of women’s empowerment from Nepal," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 325-343.
    14. Konte, M., 2014. "Gender difference in support for democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do social institutions matter?," MERIT Working Papers 009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    15. Muchomba, Felix M., 2017. "Women’s Land Tenure Security and Household Human Capital: Evidence from Ethiopia’s Land Certification," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 310-324.
    16. Benyishay,Ariel & Jones,Maria Ruth & Kondylis,Florence & Mobarak,Ahmed Mushfiq, 2016. "Are gender differences in performance innate or socially mediated ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7689, The World Bank.
    17. Collins, LaPorchia A., 2022. "Identifying Profiles of Empowerment: Does the Empowerment Mix Matter for Food Security?," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322538, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Hiller, Victor & Touré, Nouhoum, 2021. "Endogenous gender power: The two facets of empowerment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    19. Dang, Hai-Anh H. & Hiraga, Masako & Viet Nguyen, Cuong, 2022. "Childcare and maternal employment: Evidence from Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Maty Konte & Stephan Klasen, 2016. "Gender difference in support for Democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do social institutions matter?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 55-86, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iik:wpaper:187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sudheesh Kumar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iikmmin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.