IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ift/wpaper/2048.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A New Ricardian Model of Trade, Growth and Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Sugata Marjit

    (Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, Kolkata, India)

Abstract

The classical Wage Fund (Capital or Credit) framework is integrated with the simplest text-book version of the Ricardian model of comparative advantage, generating a model that replicates important features of the neo-classical production theory involving capital and labour without neo-classical assumptions. Interestingly the growth story of the model seems to be observationally equivalent to the Solow (1956) model of steady state growth. It can easily and effectively reflect on critical contemporary issues without the ammunitions of a more complex neo-classical system. Trade pampers inequality all across the globe independent of trade patterns. It is likely to increase growth rate but that rate declines over time. Technological progress without physical capital accumulation magnifies inequality in or out of steady state, generating a Picketty (2013) like situation. Financial crisis in terms of credit shortage hurts workers but benefits capitalists etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Sugata Marjit, 2020. "A New Ricardian Model of Trade, Growth and Inequality," Working Papers 2048, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    • Handle: RePEc:ift:wpaper:2048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://203.190.248.10/RePEc/ift/workingpapers/EC-20-48.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2020
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    2. Findlay, Ronald, 1984. "Growth and development in trade models," Handbook of International Economics, in: R. W. Jones & P. B. Kenen (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 185-236, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raghbendra Jha & Anandi P. Sahu, 1997. "Tax policy and Human Capital Accumulation in a Ressource-Constrained Growing Dual Economy," Public Finance Review, , vol. 25(1), pages 58-82, January.
    2. Becker, Daniel Thomas & Gundlach, Erich, 2006. "Notes on factor price equality and biased technical change in a two-cone trade model," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 68, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    3. Long, N.V. & Wong, K.Y., 1996. "Endogenous Growth and International Trade: A Survey," Working Papers 96-07, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
    4. Daniel Becker & Erich Gundlach, 2005. "Notes on Factor Price Equality and Biased Technological Change in a Two-Cone Trade Model," DEGIT Conference Papers c010_006, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    5. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2018. "Growth, Research, and Free Trade with Knowledge as Global Public Capital," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 37-66.
    6. Faridoon Khan & Amena Urooj & Farman Ullah Khan, 2020. "Factors Affecting Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis of Democratic and Non-Democratic Eras of Pakistan," iRASD Journal of Economics, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(2), pages 61-71, December.
    7. Sugata Marjit, 2020. "A new Ricardian model of trade, growth and inequality- The role of financial capital," Discussion Papers 2020-28, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    8. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2016. "Endogenous Population Dynamics and Economic Growth with Free Trade between Countries," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 3(1), pages 3-30, May.
    9. Óscar Afonso, 2001. "The Impact of International Trade on Economic Growth," FEP Working Papers 106, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    10. Sugata Marjit, 2020. "A New Ricardian Model of Trade, Growth and Inequality," CESifo Working Paper Series 8689, CESifo.
    11. William Darity & Lewis S. Davis, 2005. "Growth, trade and uneven development," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 29(1), pages 141-170, January.
    12. Ottaviano, Gianmarco & Peri, Giovanni, 2008. "Immigration and National Wages: Clarifying the Theory and the Empirics," CEPR Discussion Papers 6916, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Das Gupta, Monica & Bongaarts, John & Cleland, John, 2011. "Population, poverty, and sustainable development : a review of the evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5719, The World Bank.
    14. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    15. Kutuk, Yasin, 2022. "Inequality convergence: A world-systems theory approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 150-165.
    16. van de Klundert, T.C.M.J. & Smulders, J.A., 1991. "Reconstructing growth theory : A survey," Other publications TiSEM 19355c51-17eb-4d5d-aa66-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Lederman, Daniel & Saenz, Laura, 2005. "Innovation and development around the world, 1960-2000," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3774, The World Bank.
    18. Tung Liu & Kui-Wai Li, 2008. "Revisiting Solow’s Decomposition of Economic and Productivity Growth," Working Papers 200805, Ball State University, Department of Economics, revised Dec 2008.
    19. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2017. "Global Dynamics, Capabilities and the Crisis," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Uwe Cantner (ed.), Foundations of Economic Change, pages 83-106, Springer.
    20. Hadi Sasana & Imam Ghozali, 2017. "The Impact of Fossil and Renewable Energy Consumption on the Economic Growth in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 194-200.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ift:wpaper:2048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: S. Balasubramanian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iifttin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.