IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ico/wpaper/32.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Verteilung und Gerechtigkeit: Philosophische Perspektiven

Author

Listed:
  • Jakob Kapeller

    (Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

  • Matthias Aistleitner

    (Department of Philosophy and Theory of Science, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

  • Marianne Foelker

    (Department of Philosophy and Theory of Science, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

  • Franz X. Mohr

    (Department of Philosophy and Theory of Science, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

  • Stephan Puehringer

    (Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

Abstract

Die Frage nach dem Wesen der Gerechtigkeit ist eine in Oekonomie, Politik und Philosophie umstrittene Frage. Die nachstehende Zusammenschau von philosophischen Argumenten zum Wesen und dem rechten Verstaendnis von "Gerechtigkeit" als normativem Konzept versucht dabei nicht nur einen groben Ueberblick zur Rolle von Gerechtigkeit in der Geschichte philosophischen Denkens sowie der zeitgenoessischen politischen Philosophie zu bieten, sondern auch eine polit-oekonomische Perspektive in die philosophische Diskussion rund um Fragen der Gerechtigkeit zu integrieren. Eine solche Perspektive ist dabei geeignet die Anwendung abstrakter philosophischer Konzepte auf konkrete wirtschafts- und verteilungspolitische Fragestellung zu ermoeglichen.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakob Kapeller & Matthias Aistleitner & Marianne Foelker & Franz X. Mohr & Stephan Puehringer, 2015. "Verteilung und Gerechtigkeit: Philosophische Perspektiven," ICAE Working Papers 32, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jku.at/fileadmin/gruppen/108/ICAE_Working_Papers/wp32.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Josef Melchior & Martin Schürz, 2015. "Gerechtigkeitsurteile und Vermögensverteilung in Österreich - Wahrnehmung der Realität und Realität der Wahrnehmung von Ungleichheit," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 41(2), pages 199-233.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teresa Griesebner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/igjkuat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.