IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ico/wpaper/31.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Markets as 'ultimate judges' of economic policies Angela Merkel's discourse profile during the economic crisis and the European crisis policies

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Puehringer

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to offer an explanation of the predominance of austerity policies in Europe based on distinct crisis narratives and their underlying market metaphors in the discourse profile of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The methodological approach is a combined discourse and metaphor analysis of speeches and addresses of Angela Merkel in the aftermath of the crisis applying cognitive metaphor theory in combination with a corpus linguistic approach. The main finding of this article is that the dominant conceptual metaphors in Merkel's crisis narrative subordinate policy making to superior "market mechanisms", which are attributed with human and natural characteristics. I also highlight the strong moral focus of the crisis narrative of "living-beyond-ones-means", which forces austerity policies and hence offers an explanation for the prevalence of neoliberal policies in the Eurozone. Furthermore this article contributes to the study of the role of "market metaphors" for crisis narratives of influential political leaders and provides an analysis of the impact of discursive manifestations and metaphorical analogies on economic crisis policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Puehringer, 2015. "Markets as 'ultimate judges' of economic policies Angela Merkel's discourse profile during the economic crisis and the European crisis policies," ICAE Working Papers 31, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jku.at/fileadmin/gruppen/108/ICAE_Working_Papers/wp31.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pühringer, Stephan & Egger, Judith, 2016. "Wie krank ist unser Wirtschaftssystem? Krisen als Krankheiten im ökonomischen Diskurs," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-21, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    2. Ötsch, Walter & Pühringer, Stephan, 2017. "Right-wing populism and market-fundamentalism: Two mutually reinforcing threats to democracy in the 21st century," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-26, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    3. Graupe, Silja & Steffestun, Theresa, 2018. ""The market deals out profit and losses": Wie ökonomische Standardlehrbücher das unreflektierte Denken in Metaphern fördern," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-38, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    4. Ötsch, Walter & Pühringer, Stephan, 2019. "The anti-democratic logic of right-wing populism and neoliberal market-fundamentalism," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-48, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    5. Pühringer, Stephan & Ötsch, Walter, 2019. "Die Wirkmacht der "Liebe zum Markt": Zum anhaltenden Einfluss ordoliberaler ÖkonomInnen-Netzwerke in Politik und Gesellschaft," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-45, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teresa Griesebner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/igjkuat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.