IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/86-wp13.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EC Trade Liberalization and World Trade in Feed Grains: A Comparison and A Criticism

Author

Listed:
  • Aniss Bahrenian
  • William H. Meyers

Abstract

Agricultural policies in most countries are aimed at protecting agents involved in food production or consumption from a variety of undesirable outcomes, including: price and/or political instability, food shortages, declining agricultural income and the resulting rural-urban migration. The European Community (EC), formed in 1959, is best organized for the purpose of protecting agricultural producers and in recent years has been the target of criticism by the opponents of this protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Aniss Bahrenian & William H. Meyers, 1986. "EC Trade Liberalization and World Trade in Feed Grains: A Comparison and A Criticism," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 86-wp13, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:86-wp13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/86wp13.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=711
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bahreinian, Aniss, 1987. "EC common agricultural policy and the world trade in feed grain: a multi-region nonspatial price equilibrium analysis," ISU General Staff Papers 198701010800009612, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:86-wp13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.