Pension Reform in Russia: First Year of Implementing
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Note: The PIE International Workshop on "Pension Reform in Transition Economies", IER, Hitotsubashi University, February 22, 2003
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- de Menil, Georges, 2005.
"Why should the portfolios of mandatory, private pension funds be captive? (The foreign investment question),"
Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 123-141, January.
- Georges de Menil, 2003. "Why should the portfolios of mandatory private pension funds be captive? (the foreign investment question)," DELTA Working Papers 2003-12, DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure).
- Georges de Menil, 2005. "Why should the portfolios of mandatory private pension funds becaptive ? (The foreign investment question)," Post-Print halshs-00754102, HAL.
- Ivan Suvorov, 2020. "Expected and Unexpected Consequences of Russian Pension Increase in 2010," Russian Journal of Money and Finance, Bank of Russia, vol. 79(1), pages 93-112, March.
- Israel Marques, 2014. "Firms And Social Policy In The Post-Communist Bloc: Evidence From Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 87/EC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
- Ivan S. Grigoriev & Anna A. Dekalchuk, 2015. "School Of Autocracy: Pensions And Labour Reforms Of The First Putin Administration," HSE Working papers WP BRP 24/PS/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
- repec:zbw:bofitp:2018_007 is not listed on IDEAS
- Marques II, Israel, 2018. "Firms and social policy preferences under weak institutions : Evidence from Russia," BOFIT Discussion Papers 7/2018, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
- John B. Williamson & Matthew Williams, 2005. "Notional Defined Contribution Accounts," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 485-506, April.
- Marques II, Israel, 2018. "Firms and social policy preferences under weak institutions: Evidence from Russia," BOFIT Discussion Papers 7/2018, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hit:piedp1:146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Digital Resources Section, Hitotsubashi University Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cihitjp.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.