IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/25hum2013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Scientific Fact between New Science and scienza nuova: Giambattista Vico’s factum and John Toland’s Matter of Fact

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel Sokolov

    (Higher School of Economics, Moscow.)

Abstract

The article deals with the syncretic construction of fact which took shape in Early Modern Times at an intersection of biblical exegesis, political science, esthetics, historiography and natural sciences epistemology. The study attempts a comparative analysis of Giambattista Vico’s ‘new science’ and John Toland’s ‘travesty philosophy’, outlining shared reference points and structural similarities in their political epistemology: procedure of the authorization of facts, modal implications of the fact, economy of political dissimulation

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel Sokolov, 2013. "Scientific Fact between New Science and scienza nuova: Giambattista Vico’s factum and John Toland’s Matter of Fact," HSE Working papers WP BRP 25/HUM/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:25hum2013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2013/04/30/1296751552/25HUM2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takács, Viktor László & Bubnó, Katalin, 2013. "Önkiszolgáló Üzleti Intelligencia Rendszerek Oktatási Tapasztalatai," Acta Carolus Robertus, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7.
    2. Iwan Barankay & Magnus Johannesson & John List & Richard Friberg & Matti Liski & Kjetil Storesletten, 2013. "Guest Editors’ Preface to the Special Symposium on Field Experiments," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 115(1), pages 1-2, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mearman, Andrew, 2014. "How should economics curricula be evaluated?," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 16(PB), pages 73-86.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    history of humanities; objectivity; historical fact; scienza nuova; esthetics of originality; Newtonian exegesis; ragion di Stato.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:25hum2013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.