IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hcx/wpaper/9901.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Production, Exchange, and Appropriation in a Hawk-Dove Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Anderton

    (Department of Economics, College of the Holy Cross)

Abstract

We derive the payoffs of a hawk-dove game based upon production, exchange, and appropriation possibilities. We then link the evolutionary equilibrium of the game to economy-wide fundamentals: production, volume of trade, security of property, welfare, and the extent of hawks in the economy. Within the model we show how hawk-like behavior can be subdued by the potential of mutually beneficial exchange. The model also identifies the conditions under which appropriation possibilities are so large that hawk-like play comes to dominate the economy. We discover, under certain conditions, that an increase in each agent's productivity in its comparative advantage good reduces production and welfare. When increases in productivity result in less production and welfare, the hawk-dove society is plagued by immiserizing growth. The productivity increases which leads to immiserizing growth occur just prior to a productivity cusp that, if reached, vaults the hawk-dove economy to a dramatically improved state.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Anderton, 1999. "Production, Exchange, and Appropriation in a Hawk-Dove Economy," Working Papers 9901, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hcx:wpaper:9901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9361.00172
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderton, Charles H. & Carter, John R., 2008. "Vulnerable trade: The dark side of an Edgeworth box," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 422-432, November.
    2. Hassani-Mahmooei, Behrooz & Parris, Brett W., 2013. "Resource scarcity, effort allocation and environmental security: An agent-based theoretical approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 183-192.
    3. Charles Anderton, 2000. "Exchange of goods or exchange of blows? New directions in conflict and exchange," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 55-71.
    4. Anderton,Charles H. & Carter,John R., 2009. "Principles of Conflict Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521875578, December.
    5. Kamin, Katrin, 2022. "Bilateral trade and conflict heterogeneity: The impact of conflict on trade revisited," Kiel Working Papers 2222, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Korkut Alp Ertürk, 2011. "Governance and Asymmetric Power," Chapters, in: Mehmet Ugur & David Sunderland (ed.), Does Economic Governance Matter?, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Raul Caruso, 2004. "A Trade Institution as a Peaceful Institution?," Others 0406003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 May 2005.
    8. Karnatak, Rajat & Ramaswamy, Ram & Feudel, Ulrike, 2014. "Conjugate coupling in ecosystems: Cross-predation stabilizes food webs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 48-57.
    9. Rogers, Douglas B. & Smith, Adam C. & Wilson, Bart J., 2013. "Violence, access, and competition in the market for protection," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-17.
    10. Dmitry Kucharavy & Eric Schenk & Roland de Guio, 2009. "Long-Run Forecasting of Emerging Technologies with Logistic Models and Growth of Knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00440438, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    appropriation; property rights; Hawk-dove game; immiserizing growth;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D51 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Exchange and Production Economies
    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hcx:wpaper:9901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Matheson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deholus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.