IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hcx/wpaper/1512.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The ‘‘Loss of Chance’’ Rule as a Special Category of Damages in Medical Malpractice: A State-by-State Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • David Schap

    (Department of Economics and Accounting, College of the Holy Cross)

  • Lauren Guest

    (Department of Economics and Accounting, College of the Holy Cross)

  • Thi Tran

    (Department of Economics and Accounting, College of the Holy Cross)

Abstract

The incremental ‘‘loss of chance’’ rule is a doctrine relevant to medical malpractice cases dictating a damage calculation proportional to the victim’s reduction in chance of medical recovery due to a medical professional’s negligence. Variations in the rule or its application exist across the various states, with some states denying recovery under the doctrine altogether. Using rule descriptions and a state categorization scheme applied previously in the literature, a state-by-state investigation yields a comprehensive table displaying the status of the rule in each state. Legal citations and case excerpts are provided. Chief among the summary findings are that 24 states have adopted some version of the ‘‘loss of chance’’ rule, 17 have rejected it, four have deferred ruling on the doctrine, and five have yet to address the matter. Detailed accounts are given for the three states (Michigan, New Hampshire, and South Dakota) in which the judiciary had created a ‘‘loss of chance’’ rule, only to see the legislature rescind it.

Suggested Citation

  • David Schap & Lauren Guest & Thi Tran, 2015. "The ‘‘Loss of Chance’’ Rule as a Special Category of Damages in Medical Malpractice: A State-by-State Analysis," Working Papers 1512, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hcx:wpaper:1512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jle.aaefe.org/jle-volume21/vol21-issue2/the-loss-of-chance-rule-as-a-special-category-of-damages-in-medical-malpractice-a-state-by-state-analysis.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Forensic economics;

    JEL classification:

    • K13 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Tort Law and Product Liability; Forensic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hcx:wpaper:1512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Matheson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deholus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.