IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-00973081.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Problems of transposition and Members States "screening" process and timetable

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Messerlin

    (GEM - Groupe d'économie mondiale - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

Abstract

As requested by the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, this note focuses on Articles 14 and 15 of the proposed Directive on services. These two provisions are crucial: they define the "screening" process and the timetable which will make operational the "country of origin" principle (Article 16) on which the Directive crucially relies. As these two provisions raise economic more than legal questions, this note focuses on the economics of the Directive.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Messerlin, 2004. "Problems of transposition and Members States "screening" process and timetable," Working Papers hal-00973081, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00973081
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-00973081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-00973081/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuseppe Nicoletti & Stefano Scarpetta & Olivier Boylaud, 2000. "Summary Indicators of Product Market Regulation with an Extension to Employment Protection Legislation," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 226, OECD Publishing.
    2. Robert W. Hahn & Robert E. Litan, 2005. "Counting Regulatory Benefits and Costs: Lessons for the US and Europe," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 473-508, June.
    3. Patrick A. Messerlin, 2001. "Measuring the Costs of Protection in Europe: European Commercial Policy in the 2000s," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 102, January.
    4. Patrick Messerlin, 2001. "Measuring the costs of protection in Europe : European commercial policy in the 2000s," Post-Print hal-03394451, HAL.
    5. Alain de Serres & Peter Hoeller & Christine de la Maisonneuve, 2001. "The Width of the Intra-European Economic Borders," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 304, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8324 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8324 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8324 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8324 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Patrick Messerlin, 2004. "Problems of transposition and Members States "screening" process and timetable," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00973081, HAL.
    6. Francois, Joseph & Nelson, Douglas & Pelkmans-Balaoing, Annette, 2008. "Endogenous Protection in General Equilibrium: Estimating Political Weights in the EU," CEPR Discussion Papers 6979, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q8j620g is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Balistreri, Edward J. & Mavroidis, Petros C. & Prusa, Thomas J., 2021. "What If? Tinkering with the Counterfactual: A Comment on US–Washing Machines (Article 22.6-US)," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 421-435, October.
    9. Fritz Breuss, 2004. "WTO Dispute Settlement: An Economic Analysis of Four EU–US Mini Trade Wars—A Survey," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 275-315, December.
    10. Ghoneim, Ahmed Farouk, 2004. "Competition, cultural variety and global governance: The case of the Egyptian audiovisual system," HWWA Reports 246, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    11. Henk Kox & Arjan Lejour, 2005. "Regulatory heterogeneity as obstacle for international services trade," CPB Discussion Paper 49, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    12. Lionel Fontagné & Thierry Mayer & Soledad Zignago, 2005. "Trade in the Triad: how easy is the access to large markets?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1401-1430, November.
    13. Alexandra Ferreira-Lopes & Ccndida Sousa & Helena Carvalho & Nuno Crespo, 2017. "Trade Protectionism and Intra-industry Trade: A USA - EU Comparison," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(2), pages 88-102, December.
    14. Kyoji Fukao & Goushi Kataoka & Arata Kuno, 2003. "How to Measure Non-tariff Barriers? A Critical Examination of the Price-Differential Approach," Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series d03-08, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    15. Ghoneim, Ahmed Farouk, 2004. "Competition, Cultural Variety and Global Governance: The Case of the Egyptian Audiovisual System," Report Series 26109, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    16. Jean‐Christophe Maur, 2005. "Exporting Europe's Trade Policy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(11), pages 1565-1590, November.
    17. Lee, Hiro & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2006. "Deep integration and its impacts on non-members: EU enlargement and East Asia," MPRA Paper 82286, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q90i5i1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q8j620g is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Swinbank, Alan, 2004. "Dirty Tariffication Revisited: The EU and Sugar," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14.
    21. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i::p:789-811 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Bernard POIRINE & Jean-François GAY, 2015. "Le Coût Du Protectionnisme Dans Une Petite Économie Insulaire : Le Cas Extrême De La Polynésie Française," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 42, pages 133-156.
    23. Bouët, Antoine, 2006. "What can the poor expect from trade liberalization?: opening the "black box" of trade modeling," MTID discussion papers 93, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    24. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8309 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Patrick Messerlin, 2010. "New challenging issues for world trade and the world economy Strategies for the EC-Turkey Custom Union," Working Papers hal-00972937, HAL.
    26. Jean‐Christophe Bureau & Luca Salvatici, 2005. "Agricultural trade restrictiveness in the European Union and the United States," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 33(s3), pages 479-490, November.
    27. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q90i5i1 is not listed on IDEAS
    28. Patrick Messerlin, 2003. "Agriculture in the Doha Agenda," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00972813, HAL.
    29. Francois, Joseph & Nelson, Douglas R., 2014. "Political support for trade policy in the European Union," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 243-253.
    30. Eithne Murphy, 2017. "Cournot's Trade Theory and its Neoclassical Appropriation: Lessons to be Learnt about the Use and Abuse of Models," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00973081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.