IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-00242925.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

De la pluralité des ordres, les problèmes d'environnement et de développement durable à la lumière de la théorie de la justification

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Godard

    (CECO - Laboratoire d'économétrie de l'École polytechnique - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Most scientific approaches aim at elucidating a unique order to obtain a scientific image of their object. This strategy revealed efficient in most cases but led researchers to ignore phenomena resulting from the composition of several orders, each time this composition is not an accessory feature of reality but a core one. Another strategy is then to be chosen, which takes the plurality of orders as a basic feature of the reality to grasp. The type of plurality considered in the paper is the one resulting from the justification theory and its application to environmental and sustainable issues. Several questions are tackled. What is the status of the concept of natural patrimony? What is the destiny of economic assessment in the context of environmental conflicts? Shall we consider sustainable development as a new legitimate social order of justification? What does a fair and equitable distribution of greenhouse gas emission rights look like? An examination of these questions demonstrates how much the assumption of plural social orders may give deep insights on key issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Godard, 2004. "De la pluralité des ordres, les problèmes d'environnement et de développement durable à la lumière de la théorie de la justification," Working Papers hal-00242925, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00242925
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00242925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00242925/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samira Chaklatti & Damien Rousselière, 2006. "Confiance, justification et controverse sur les OGM en Europe," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 81, pages 61-93.
    2. Ali DOUAI & Matthieu MONTALBAN, 2009. "Institutions and the environment: the case for a historical political economy," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2009-12, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    3. Clément Feger & Laurent Mermet & Emily Mckenzie & Bhaskar Vira, 2017. "Improving Decisions with Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Information," Working Papers hal-01930929, HAL.
    4. Magali Savès, 2022. "Intégrer la limite environnementale dans les structures de gouvernance des entreprises," Post-Print hal-04169591, HAL.
    5. Héloïse Valette, 2024. "Analysing the Evolution of Water Governance Models in Indonesia Through the Economies of Worth Framework," Post-Print hal-04412387, HAL.
    6. Remig, Moritz C., 2017. "Structured pluralism in ecological economics — A reply to Peter Söderbaum's commentary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 533-537.
    7. Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier & Myriam-Emilie Kessari & G. Palma & Leila Temri & S. Tozanli, 2016. "Towards a sustainable convention: values and practices in the French stone fruits’value chain," Post-Print hal-01407267, HAL.
    8. Nizet, Jean & Van Dam, Denise, 2014. "Les exploitations bios face à leurs contextes. Des stratégies diversifiées et interdépendantes," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 95(2).
    9. Van Dam, Denise & Nizet, Jean, 2014. "Organic farmers facing the processes of institutionalization and conventionalization. A longitudinal study in Belgium," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 95(4).
    10. El Hadad Gauthier, Fatima & Kessari, Myriam & Palma, Giulia & Temri, Leïla & Tozanli, Selma, 2016. "Towards a sustainable convention: values and practices in the French stone fruits’value chain," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 244957, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. BELIS-BERGOUIGNAN Marie-Claude (E3i-IFReDE-GRES) & CAZALS Clarisse (E3i-IFReDE-GRES), 2006. "Voluntary environmental approaches in French wine growing: a variety of adhesion factors (In French)," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2006-11, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    12. Samira Chaklatti & Damien Rousselière, 2006. "Trust, justification and controversy on the GMOs in Europe [Confiance, justification et controverse sur les OGM en Europe]," Post-Print hal-01201137, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00242925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.