IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03908478.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When Risk Perception Gets in the Way: Probability Weighting and Underprevention

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélien Baillon

    (EM - EMLyon Business School, GATE Lyon Saint-Étienne - Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon - Saint-Etienne - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Han Bleichrodt
  • Aysil Emirmahmutoglu
  • Johannes Jaspersen
  • Richard Peter

    (University of Iowa)

Abstract

Prevention efforts, such as quitting smoking, flu vaccination, and exercising, are of crucial importance in health policy, but people tend to undertake too few of them. The main reason is that most prevention efforts only reduce but do not completely eliminate the risk of poor health. This makes it harder for people to assess the benefits of prevention, because they tend to misperceive and transform probabilities. In "When Risk Perception Gets in the Way: Probability Weighting and Underprevention," Baillon et al. introduce psychological insights (probability weighting) in a model of optimal decision making and show that most people undertake too little prevention when the risk of poor health is between 10% and 80%. The paper discusses several policy measures to make people spend more on prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélien Baillon & Han Bleichrodt & Aysil Emirmahmutoglu & Johannes Jaspersen & Richard Peter, 2022. "When Risk Perception Gets in the Way: Probability Weighting and Underprevention," Post-Print halshs-03908478, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03908478
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2019.1910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emmanuelle Augeraud-Véron & Marc Leandri, 2024. "Optimal self-protection and health risk perceptions: Exploring connections between risk theory and the Health Belief Model," Post-Print hal-04557076, HAL.
    2. Yu Gao & Zhenxing Huang & Ning Liu & Jia Yang, 2024. "Are physicians rational under ambiguity?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 183-203, April.
    3. Emmanuelle Augeraud-Véron & Marc Leandri, 2023. "Optimal self-protection and health risk perception: bridging the gap between risk theory and the Health Belief Model," EconomiX Working Papers 2023-12, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    4. Emmanuelle Augeraud‐Véron & Marc Leandri, 2024. "Optimal self‐protection and health risk perceptions: Exploring connections between risk theory and the Health Belief Model," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(7), pages 1565-1583, July.
    5. Richard Peter, 2024. "The economics of self-protection," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 49(1), pages 6-35, March.
    6. Jan Gaska, 2023. "Losses from Fluvial Floods in Poland over the 21st Century – Estimation Using the Productivity Costs Method," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 357-383, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03908478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.