IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03381887.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reappraising the Problem of CEO Compensation: Modern and Old Theoretical Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Chapas

    (ESDES - ESDES, Lyon Business School - UCLy - UCLy - UCLy (Lyon Catholic University), UR CONFLUENCE : Sciences et Humanités (EA 1598) - UCLy - UCLy (Lyon Catholic University))

  • Virgile Chassagnon

    (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

CEO compensation is a controversial issue. In recent decades, the mainstream theory of corporate governance has failed to produce a convincing explanation of the factors that shape the CEO compensation process, which, according to managerial power theory, is largely determined by the CEO's discretionary power. These problems are increasing in the era of corporate social responsibility. This article's objective is to show that we can better understand the problem of CEO compensation by reconsidering the various contributions of older research that focused on uncertainty and entrepreneurial action on the one hand and on industrial sabotage and reasonable values on the other. This objective is a prerequisite to rethinking CEO compensation in relation to the challenges of modern production, to the necessary development of an industrial democracy in our market societies, and to constructing a solid theoretical basis from which to reconsider CEO compensation in relation to the true mission of CEOs and to a normative vision for reform. Thus, this article provides theoretical and conceptual bases for a renewed academic debate that will allow for explanatory progress regarding the understanding of the place that the issue of CEO compensation holds in the emergence of a more just version of capitalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Chapas & Virgile Chassagnon, 2021. "Reappraising the Problem of CEO Compensation: Modern and Old Theoretical Perspectives," Post-Print halshs-03381887, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03381887
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2021.1948263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03381887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.