IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01868087.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards a Political Philosophy of Management: Performativity & Visibility in management practices

Author

Listed:
  • François-Xavier de Vaujany

    (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)

  • Jeremy Aroles

    (Alliance MBS - Alliance Manchester Business School - University of Manchester [Manchester])

  • Pierre Laniray

    (IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

Abstract

Phenomenological, process-based and post-Marxist approaches have stressed the immanent nature of the ontogenesis of our world. The concept of performativity epitomizes these temporal, spatial and material views. Reality is always in movement itself: it is constantly materially and socially ‘performed'. Other views lead to a pre-defined world that would be mostly revealed through sensations (i.e. ‘representational perspectives'). These transcendental stances assume that a subject, although pre-existing experience, is the absolute condition of possibility of it. In this paper, we develop another view of performativity (either complementary or interrelated to an immanent stance), one that re-introduces transcendence in the analysis but sees in it something dialogical to the process itself. We draw from the notions of visibility-invisibility and continuity-discontinuity (Merleau-Ponty 1945/2013, 1964) in order to show how everyday activity both performs and makes visible the world. From that perspective, modes of visibility appear as conditions of possibility of performativity itself. We draw some implications for the conceptualization of management practices.

Suggested Citation

  • François-Xavier de Vaujany & Jeremy Aroles & Pierre Laniray, 2019. "Towards a Political Philosophy of Management: Performativity & Visibility in management practices," Post-Print halshs-01868087, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01868087
    DOI: 10.1007/s40926-018-0091-4
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01868087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01868087/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40926-018-0091-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Vladislav V. Fomin & Stefan Haefliger & Kalle Lyytinen, 2018. "Rules, Practices, and Information Technology: A Trifecta of Organizational Regulation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 755-773, September.
    2. Haridimos Tsoukas & Robert Chia, 2002. "On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 567-582, October.
    3. Jeremy Aroles & Christine McLean, 2016. "Rethinking Stability and Change in the Study of Organizational Routines: Difference and Repetition in a Newspaper-Printing Factory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 535-550, June.
    4. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Andreas J. Reuschl, 2018. "Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 317-334, January.
    5. Laure Cabantous & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2011. "Rational Decision Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality's Éternel Retour," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 573-586, June.
    6. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Wlad Fomin & Stefan Haefliger & Kalle Lyytinen, 2018. "Rules, Practices and Information Technology: A Trifecta of Organizational Regulation," Post-Print hal-01925292, HAL.
    7. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2002. "Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 249-273, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sean Hansen & A. James Baroody, 2020. "Electronic Health Records and the Logics of Care: Complementarity and Conflict in the U.S. Healthcare System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 57-75, March.
    2. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
    3. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    4. Dragos Vieru & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2016. "Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices," Post-Print hal-01458031, HAL.
    5. Oliver Laasch & Dirk C. Moosmayer & Frithjof Arp, 2020. "Responsible Practices in the Wild: An Actor-Network Perspective on Mobile Apps in Learning as Translation(s)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 253-277, January.
    6. Vieru, Dragos & Rivard, Suzanne, 2014. "Organizational identity challenges in a post-merger context: A case study of an information system implementation project," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 381-386.
    7. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    8. Sunday Bolade, 2022. "A Complementarity Perspective of Knowledge Resources," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1300-1320, June.
    9. Khalid Alzadjali & Amany Elbanna, 0. "Smart Institutional Intervention in the Adoption of Digital Infrastructure: The Case of Government Cloud Computing in Oman," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    10. Alexandra Michel, 2014. "The Mutual Constitution of Persons and Organizations: An Ontological Perspective on Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1082-1110, August.
    11. Jeremy P. Birnholtz & Michael D. Cohen & Susannah V. Hoch, 2007. "Organizational Character: On the Regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 315-332, April.
    12. Martha S. Feldman & Brian T. Pentland & Luciana D’Adderio & Nathalie Lazaric, 2016. "Beyond Routines as Things: Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 505-513, June.
    13. Daniela Andreini & Cristina Bettinelli & Nicolai J. Foss & Marco Mismetti, 2022. "Business model innovation: a review of the process-based literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1089-1121, December.
    14. Zamani, Efpraxia D. & Spanaki, Konstantina, 2023. "Affective temporal experiences and new work modalities: The role of Information and Communication Technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. François-Xavier de Vaujany, 2018. "Legitimation process in organizations and organizing: An ontological discussion," Post-Print halshs-01840927, HAL.
    16. Anja Danner-Schröder & Daniel Geiger, 2016. "Unravelling the Motor of Patterning Work: Toward an Understanding of the Microlevel Dynamics of Standardization and Flexibility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 633-658, June.
    17. D'Adderio, Luciana & Pollock, Neil, 2020. "Making routines the same: Crafting similarity and singularity in routines transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    18. Miguel Pina e Cunha & Ken Kamoche & Stewart R. Clegg, 2004. "Clues, cues and complexity: unpacking the concept of organizational surprise," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp453, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    19. Yukika Awazu & Stefania Mariano & Sue Newell, 2019. "The mediating role of artifacts in position practice at work: Examples from a project-based context," Post-Print hal-02110757, HAL.
    20. Mikko Vesa & Frank den Hond & J. Tuomas Harviainen, 2019. "On the Possibility of a Paratelic Initiation of Organizational Wrongdoing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01868087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.