IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01242590.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The legibility of food package information in France: an equal challenge for young and elderly consumers?

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Droulers

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Jennifer Amar

    (IREA - Institut de Recherche sur les Entreprises et les Administrations - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud, IESEG School of Managementg)

Abstract

Objective The present study investigated whether food package information is legible in a real purchase context; more specifically, it examined the level of legibility of non-mandatory, mandatory and nutritional information as well as the influence of age on legibility. This is an important issue, especially for older consumers who are usually advised to pay attention to their diet.Design An in-store study was conducted in a French hypermarket. Descriptive statistics were used to measure the overall level of legibility and then ANOVA tests were carried out to examine the influence of age on the legibility of information. Complementary results included the influence of level of education.Setting Participants were asked to read information on four food packages when they were food shopping.Subjects The sample included 196 consumers aged 18–82 years.Results An asymmetry was observed between the extremely high level of legibility of non-mandatory information and the low level of legibility of mandatory and nutritional information provided on food packages. Elderly respondents performed significantly worse than their younger counterparts. An interaction effect was found between age and level of education on the legibility of mandatory information.Conclusions Legibility of mandatory information is clearly unsatisfactory. There appears to be a hierarchy between significant, but non-mandatory, company information and important mandatory and nutritional information. The first type of information is promoted on food packages whereas the last two are all but concealed to older and less educated consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Droulers & Jennifer Amar, 2016. "The legibility of food package information in France: an equal challenge for young and elderly consumers?," Post-Print halshs-01242590, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01242590
    DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015002141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amar, Jennifer & Droulers, Olivier & Legohérel, Patrick, 2017. "Typography in destination advertising: An exploratory study and research perspectives," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 77-86.
    2. Magdalena Ankiel & Bogdan Sojkin & Mariola Grzybowska-Brzezinska, 2020. "Packaging as a Source of Information on the Product in Food Purchasing Decisions: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 356-372.
    3. Dimitris Skalkos & Ioanna S. Kosma & Eleni Chasioti & Thomas Bintsis & Haralabos C. Karantonis, 2021. "Consumers’ Perception on Traceability of Greek Traditional Foods in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01242590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.