IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00728493.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Une singularité dans l'aide à la décision : le cas de la Liaison 16

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Godé

    (CReA - Centre de Recherche de l'École de l'air - Armée de l'air et de l'espace)

  • Valérie Hauch

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

  • Mélanie Lasou

    (CReA - Centre de Recherche de l'École de l'air - Armée de l'air et de l'espace)

  • Jean-Fabrice Lebraty

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)

Abstract

This article aims at studying net-centric decision support systems. The main research question examines the effect of such systems on decision maker creativity in extreme situation. We perform an exploratory case study in the French Air Force context. The system, currently used on operational theaters, is known as Link 16. Based upon triangulation of 33 interviews, shadowing observations as well as the analysis of doctrinal documentations and reports from the field, we show that Link 16 increases decisional creativity. Although the tactical system has not been designed to support creativity, it leads to occurrence of creativity in decision making thanks to (1) flexibility in the interface in accordance with strict rules, (2) integration into organizational process and (3) users' capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Godé & Valérie Hauch & Mélanie Lasou & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2012. "Une singularité dans l'aide à la décision : le cas de la Liaison 16," Post-Print halshs-00728493, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00728493
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00728493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00728493/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Dominguez, 2011. "Valeurs et outils de gestion. De la dynamique d'appropriation au pilotage," Post-Print halshs-00740552, HAL.
    2. Sung, Sun Young & Choi, Jin Nam, 2012. "Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 4-13.
    3. Jean-Fabrice Lebraty & Jacques Lebraty, 2010. "Décision en situation, holisme et complexité," Post-Print halshs-00545790, HAL.
    4. J. Angot, 2007. "Méthodes de recherche en management," Post-Print hal-00682166, HAL.
    5. Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2013. "Improving Decision Making in Extreme Situations: The Case of a Military Decision Support System," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2002. "Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 249-273, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nordine Benkeltoum, 2017. "Open source software adoption for safety-critical information systems design: the Thales case study [Adoption de l’open source pour la conception de systèmes d’information critiques : le cas Thales," Post-Print hal-04191308, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cécile Godé & Pierre Barbaroux, 2016. "Combining Technologies’ Properties to Cope with Uncertainty: Lessons from the Military," Post-Print hal-03223680, HAL.
    2. Verena Brinks, 2016. "Situated affect and collective meaning: A community perspective on processes of value creation and commercialization in enthusiast-driven fields," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(6), pages 1152-1169, June.
    3. Genevieve Musca, 2007. "La construction de compétences dans l'action," Post-Print hal-01517916, HAL.
    4. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    5. Josefin Borg & Anna Yström, 2020. "Collaborating for energy efficiency in Swedish shipping industry: interrelating practice and challenges," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4289-4310, June.
    6. Swan, Jacky & Goussevskaia, Anna & Newell, Sue & Robertson, Maxine & Bresnen, Mike & Obembe, Ademola, 2007. "Modes of organizing biomedical innovation in the UK and US and the role of integrative and relational capabilities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 529-547, May.
    7. Farzana Riva & Solon Magrizos & Mohammad Rabiul Basher Rubel, 2021. "Investigating the link between managers' green knowledge and leadership style, and their firms' environmental performance: The mediation role of green creativity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3228-3240, November.
    8. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    9. Markku Sotarauta & Nina Mustikkamäki, 2015. "Institutional Entrepreneurship, Power, and Knowledge in Innovation Systems: Institutionalization of Regenerative Medicine in Tampere, Finland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 342-357, April.
    10. Jordan Vazquez & Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2018. "Environnement big data et décision : l'étape de contre la montre du tour de France 2017," Post-Print halshs-02188793, HAL.
    11. Dragos Vieru & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2016. "Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices," Post-Print hal-01458031, HAL.
    12. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    13. Ladds, Emma & Greenhalgh, Trisha & Byng, Richard & Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah & Kalin, Asli & Shaw, Sara, 2023. "A contemporary ontology of continuity in general practice: Capturing its multiple essences in a digital age," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    14. Anca Metiu, 2006. "Owning the Code: Status Closure in Distributed Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 418-435, August.
    15. Popli, Manish & Akbar, Mohammad & Kumar, Vikas & Gaur, Ajai, 2016. "Reconceptualizing cultural distance: The role of cultural experience reserve in cross-border acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 404-412.
    16. Ryan W. Quinn & Monica C. Worline, 2008. "Enabling Courageous Collective Action: Conversations from United Airlines Flight 93," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 497-516, August.
    17. D'Adderio, Luciana, 2008. "The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 769-789, June.
    18. Clint Chadwick & Adina Dabu, 2009. "Human Resources, Human Resource Management, and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Causal Linkages," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 253-272, February.
    19. Maddah, Negin & Heydari, Babak, 2024. "Building back better: Modeling decentralized recovery in sociotechnical systems using strategic network dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    20. Lam, Alice, 2008. "The Tacit Knowledge Problem in Multinational Corporations: Japanese and US Offshore Knowledge Incubators," MPRA Paper 11487, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00728493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.