IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00544956.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contrôle et RSE aux frontières de l'entreprise : la gestion responsable de la relation fournisseurs dans les grands groupes industriels

Author

Listed:
  • Françoise Quairel

    (DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'importance de l'externalisation et de la sous-traitance est croissante. Dans ce contexte, la chaine d'approvisionnement doit être intégrée au périmètre de responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise (RSE) et par conséquent dans le système de contrôle inter-organisationnel. Cet article analyse comment les grands groupes contrôlent les performances RSE de leur fournisseurs et à quelles conditions ce contrôle est effectif. Le cadre théorique s'appuie sur les trois formes de contrôle inter firme : contrôle par le marché, par la bureaucratie, par la confiance et le réseau. La recherche empirique porte sur l'étude de la RSE dans la gestion des relations fournisseurs de cinq groupes industriels considérés comme pro-actifs dans ce domaine. Le contrôle par le marché n'intègre pas effectivement la RSE ; le contrôle bureaucratique met en place des codes de conduite, des évaluations des performances RSE des fournisseurs, des audits. Les fournisseurs sont alors placés dans une injonction contradictoire entre une pression pour un prix le plus bas possible et des contraintes de stricte conformité à des procédures et à des codes de conduite. Le troisième mode de contrôle est un contrôle social, basé sur la confiance ; Il est adapté aux caractéristiques des attentes en matière de RSE : résultats non mesurables, critères d'évaluation peu précis, perspective gagnant-gagnant au sein d'un partenariat. Cependant cette forme n'est mise en oeuvre que dans un très petit nombre de cas, alors que les relations fournisseurs analysées sont contrôlées par le marché ou la bureaucratie. Il existe un fossé important entre le discours messianique des grandes entreprises étudiées et l'effectivité des dispositifs de contrôle RSE qu'elles mettent en oeuvre dans leur chaine d'approvisionnement.

Suggested Citation

  • Françoise Quairel, 2007. "Contrôle et RSE aux frontières de l'entreprise : la gestion responsable de la relation fournisseurs dans les grands groupes industriels," Post-Print halshs-00544956, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00544956
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00544956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00544956/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dekker, Henri C., 2004. "Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 27-49, January.
    2. William G. Ouchi, 1979. "A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(9), pages 833-848, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Leotta, 2016. "Inter-firm coordination as an Information problem. The case of a divisionalized company," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 167-188.
    2. Henri C. Dekker & Alexandra Van den Abbeele, 2010. "Organizational Learning and Interfirm Control: The Effects of Partner Search and Prior Exchange Experiences," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1233-1250, December.
    3. Ranjith Appuhami & Sujatha Perera & Hector Perera, 2011. "Management Controls in Public–Private Partnerships: An Analytical Framework," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(1), pages 64-79, March.
    4. Rachel Levy & Damien Talbot, 2015. "Control by proximity: Evidence from the 'Aerospace Valley' Competitiveness Cluster," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 955-972, June.
    5. Outila, Virpi & Mihailova, Irina & Reiche, B. Sebastian & Piekkari, Rebecca, 2020. "A communicative perspective on the trust-control link in Russia," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    6. Holger Patzelt & Dean A. Shepherd, 2008. "The Decision to Persist with Underperforming Alliances: The Role of Trust and Control," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 1217-1243, November.
    7. Speklé, R.F., 2003. "Configurations of Control: A Transaction Cost Approach," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-071-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Long, Chris P., 2018. "To control and build trust: How managers use organizational controls and trust-building activities to motivate subordinate cooperation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 69-91.
    9. Jetta Frost & Rick Vogel & Khaled Bagban, 2016. "Managing Interdependence in Multi-business Organizations," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 17(2), pages 225-260, August.
    10. Thomas Gackstatter & Benedikt Müller-Stewens & Klaus Möller, 2019. "Effective accounting processes: the role of formal and informal controls," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 131-152, July.
    11. Reusen, Evelien & Stouthuysen, Kristof, 2017. "Misaligned control: The role of management control system imitation in supply chains," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 22-35.
    12. Andrea Dello Sbarba & Riccardo Giannetti & Alessandro Marelli, 2020. "Private equity firms and management control: the framing of shareholder-oriented practices," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(4), pages 953-987, December.
    13. Maria Cadiz Dyball & Andy Fengfei Wang, 2017. "The Links Among Characteristics, Controls And Performance Of Inter-Firm Innovation Projects," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06), pages 1-33, August.
    14. Damien Talbot, 2015. "Contrôles et proximités au sein de la supply chain aéronautique," Post-Print hal-02351969, HAL.
    15. Juan Manuel Ramon-Jeronimo & Raquel Florez-Lopez & Maria Angeles Ramon-Jeronimo, 2017. "Understanding the Generation of Value along Supply Chains: Balancing Control Information and Relational Governance Mechanisms in Downstream and Upstream Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-31, August.
    16. Ramírez-García, Carolina & Vélez-Elorza, María L. & Alvarez-ardet-Espejo, María Concepción, 2013. "¿Cómo controlan los franquiciadores españoles a sus franquiciados?," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10.
    17. Miller, Peter & Kurunmäki, Liisa & O'Leary, Ted, 2008. "Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 942-967.
    18. Ellen Haustein & Robert Luther & Peter Schuster, 2014. "Management control systems in innovation companies: a literature based framework," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 343-382, February.
    19. Caglio, Ariela & Ditillo, Angelo, 2008. "A review and discussion of management control in inter-firm relationships: Achievements and future directions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 865-898.
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2617 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Vosselman, Ed & Meer-Kooistra, Jeltje van der, 2009. "Accounting for control and trust building in interfirm transactional relationships," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 267-283, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00544956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.