IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00525832.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pertinence des méthodes d'évaluation financière des marques : une étude empirique au niveau international

Author

Listed:
  • Adel Beldi

    (IESEG - UCL - Université catholique de Lille)

  • Edouard Chastenet

    (ESDES - ESDES, Lyon Business School - UCLy - UCLy - UCLy (Lyon Catholic University))

  • Jean-Claude Dupuis

    (ESDES - ESDES, Lyon Business School - UCLy - UCLy - UCLy (Lyon Catholic University))

  • Mohamed Talfi

    (ESDES - ESDES, Lyon Business School - UCLy - UCLy - UCLy (Lyon Catholic University))

Abstract

Face à l'absence de reconnaissance en comptabilité des marques générées en interne, la divulgation d'informations complémentaires pourrait être la solution la plus adéquate pour informer le marché sur la valeur de ces actifs incorporels. Cet article étudie la pertinence de la valorisation financière des marques et son impact sur la capitalisation boursière des entreprises qui les possèdent. Sur la base d'un échantillon de 153 observations représentant les valeurs des principales marques internationales valorisées sur trois années successives (2007-2008-2009) par deux organismes spécialisés et indépendants, les résultats de notre étude montrent que les valeurs de marques communiquées par ces derniers apportent un contenu informationnel supplémentaire pour les investisseurs et les analystes financiers afin de valoriser les entreprises qui exploitent ces marques.

Suggested Citation

  • Adel Beldi & Edouard Chastenet & Jean-Claude Dupuis & Mohamed Talfi, 2010. "Pertinence des méthodes d'évaluation financière des marques : une étude empirique au niveau international," Post-Print halshs-00525832, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00525832
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00525832v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00525832v2/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Easton, Pd & Harris, Ts, 1991. "Earnings As An Explanatory Variable For Returns," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 19-36.
    2. Amir, Eli & Lev, Baruch, 1996. "Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1-3), pages 3-30, October.
    3. Carol J. Simon & Mary W. Sullivan, 1993. "The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 28-52.
    4. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1995. "Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(1), pages 131-155, March.
    5. Julian Heslop, 2008. "Discussion of ‘Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence’," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 273-274.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zakaria Nejjari & Hanane Aamoum, 2023. "The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Profitability, Market Value, Productivity, and Return on Equity: Empirical Evidence from Moroccan ICT Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1734-1748, June.
    2. Emmanuel Laffort & Véronique Blum, 2018. "A taxonomy approach to brand value: a matter of logics [Une approche taxonomique de l'évaluation de la marque : une affaire de logiques]," Post-Print hal-03336012, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kothari, S. P., 2001. "Capital markets research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 105-231, September.
    2. Stephen H. Penman & Francesco Reggiani & Scott A. Richardson & İrem Tuna, 2018. "A framework for identifying accounting characteristics for asset pricing models, with an evaluation of book‐to‐price," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 24(4), pages 488-520, September.
    3. Ilanit Gavious & Dafna Schwartz, 2009. "The Valuation Implications of Sales Growth in Start-up Ventures," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, Fall.
    4. Dimitrios Kousenidis & Christos Negakis & Iordanis Floropoulos, 2000. "Size and book-to-market factors in the relationship between average stock returns and average book returns: some evidence from an emerging market," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 225-243.
    5. Callen, Jeffrey L. & Gavious, Ilanit & Segal, Dan, 2010. "The complementary relationship between financial and non-financial information in the biotechnology industry and the degree of investor sophistication," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 61-76.
    6. Atif Ellahie, 2021. "Earnings beta," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 81-122, March.
    7. Kim, Oksana, 2013. "Russian Accounting System: Value Relevance of Reported Information and the IFRS Adoption Perspective," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 525-547.
    8. Frederico Belo & Xiaoji Lin & Maria Ana Vitorino, 2014. "Brand Capital and Firm Value," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 17(1), pages 150-169, January.
    9. Keyoor Purani & Krishnan Jeesha, 2022. "Community based brand equity as brand culture: advancing brand equity conceptualization for a connected world," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 52-70, June.
    10. Maria Ana Vitorino, 2014. "Understanding the Effect of Advertising on Stock Returns and Firm Value: Theory and Evidence from a Structural Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 227-245, January.
    11. Richardson, Scott & Tuna, Irem & Wysocki, Peter, 2010. "Accounting anomalies and fundamental analysis: A review of recent research advances," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 410-454, December.
    12. Helena Isidro & José G. Dias, 2017. "Earnings quality and the heterogeneous relation between earnings and stock returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1143-1165, November.
    13. Hsu, Audrey Wen-hsin & Duh, Rong-Ruey & Cheng, Kang, 2012. "Does the Control-based Approach to Consolidated Statements Better Reflect Market Value than the Ownership-based Approach?," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 198-225.
    14. Chen, Peter & Zhang, Guochang, 2007. "How do accounting variables explain stock price movements? Theory and evidence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 219-244, July.
    15. Mishari M. Alfaraih & Faisal S. Alanezi, 2011. "Does Voluntary Disclosure Level Affect The Value Relevance Of Accounting Information?," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 3(2), pages 65-84.
    16. Shadi Farshadfar & Reza M. Monem, 2019. "Further evidence of the relationship between accruals and future cash flows," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 143-176, March.
    17. Murad Harasheh & Stefano Gatti, 2015. "Going Public and Underpricing as Brand Value Enhancing Tools," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(11), pages 1208-1226, November.
    18. Fargher, Neil & Wee, Marvin, 2019. "The impact of Ball and Brown (1968) on generations of research," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 55-72.
    19. Jamel Chouaibi, 2021. "Innovation and Financial Performance in Manufacturing Companies: an Empirical Study Tunisian," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1870-1890, December.
    20. Dimitrios I. Maditinos & Željko Šević & Jelena Stankevičienė & Nikolaos Karakoltsidis, 2013. "Earnings response coefficients in the Greek market," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 414-431, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00525832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.