IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00516132.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technology Transfer between Research Units and Enterprises. An approach to centred model in the impact on territorial strategic targets

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Ignacio Dalmau Porta

    (Departamento de Organización de Empresas - UPV - Universitat Politècnica de València = Universitad Politecnica de Valencia = Polytechnic University of Valencia)

  • Bernardo Javier Pérez Castano

    (Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial y Estadística - Univalle - Universidad del Valle [Cali])

  • Joan Josep Baixauli I Baixauli

    (Departamento de Organización de Empresas - UPV - Universitat Politècnica de València = Universitad Politecnica de Valencia = Polytechnic University of Valencia)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present significant advances on a research project under development by the authors. The project, analyses the bases for a model that evaluates technology transfer between research units and companies; it does it, by trimming the impact on strategic targets, investigation units, companies and the region itself in which they are immersed by analyzing the impact in terms of their development and consequential benefits for the society. It is tried to diffuse the preliminary design of a model, the research method and tools that facilitate the multidimensional approaches that are able to involve actors who are of very different nature (partnerships) and that allow generating and managing knowledge in a participative way. This would encourage an improvement in the dialogue between science and society, defining specific research activities and as a final step, taking actions without losing in mind, the goal of favouring and encouraging the ownership of this knowledge by the territorial actors and the people who eventually will contribute to the improvement of the territorial governance. This model underlines the scientific world and territorial complementary action, the participative research-action activity could be defined as a kind of research behaviour in which researchers and territorial actors are involved in pursue of a double objective: first of all, a scientific one which would be represented by improving the knowledge on a concrete aspect of the territorial structure and/or dynamics; and a second one, that would embrace the acting and resolution of concrete problems of a definite region or territory.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Ignacio Dalmau Porta & Bernardo Javier Pérez Castano & Joan Josep Baixauli I Baixauli, 2007. "Technology Transfer between Research Units and Enterprises. An approach to centred model in the impact on territorial strategic targets," Post-Print halshs-00516132, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00516132
    DOI: 10.1000
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00516132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00516132/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Love, James H. & Roper, Stephen, 2001. "Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 643-661, April.
    2. Everett M. Rogers & Brad ‘J’ Hall & Michio Hashimoto & Morten Steffensen & Kristen L. Speakman & Molly K. Timko, 1999. "Technology Transfer from University-Based Research Centers," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(6), pages 687-705, November.
    3. Andrea Bassanini & Stefano Scarpetta & Ignazio Visco, 2000. "Knowledge technology and economic growth: recent evidence from OECD countries," Working Paper Research 06, National Bank of Belgium.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Jesús Rodríguez-Gulías & David Rodeiro-Pazos & Sara Fernández-López & Manuel Ángel Nogueira-Moreiras, 2021. "The effect of regional resources on innovation: a firm-centered approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 760-791, June.
    2. Enrique López-Bazo & Elisabet Motellón, 2016. "“Innovation, heterogeneous firms, and the region”," AQR Working Papers 201607, University of Barcelona, Regional Quantitative Analysis Group, revised Apr 2016.
    3. Andreas Koch & Harald Strotmann, 2006. "Determinants of Innovative Activity in Newly Founded Knowledge Intensive Business Service Firms," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Michael Fritsch & Juergen Schmude (ed.), Entrepreneurship in the Region, chapter 10, pages 195-224, Springer.
    4. Reinhilde Veugelers (ed.), 2009. "The Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System - Full Report," Books, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, number 495.
    5. A. Alventosa & Y. Gómez & V. Martínez-Molés & J. Vila, 2016. "Location and Innovation Optimism: a Behavioral-Experimental Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(4), pages 890-904, December.
    6. Stephen Roper & Nola Hewitt-Dundas, 2006. "International Innovation Comparisons: Insight or Illusion?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(3), pages 385-401, June.
    7. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Mariusz Próchniak, 2018. "The impact of product market competition on GDP per capita growth in the EU countries: does the model of capitalism matter?," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 131-155, March.
    9. Roper, Stephen & Hewitt-Dundas, Nola & Love, James H., 2004. "An ex ante evaluation framework for the regional benefits of publicly supported R&D projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 487-509, April.
    10. Justin Doran & Declan Jordan & Eoin O’Leary, 2012. "The effects of the frequency of spatially proximate and distant interaction on innovation by Irish SMEs," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7-8), pages 705-727, September.
    11. Maliranta, Mika, 2001. "Productivity Growth and Micro-level Restructuring. Finnish experiences during the turbulent decades," Discussion Papers 757, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    12. James H. Love & Stephen Roper & Priit Vahter, 2014. "Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(11), pages 1703-1716, November.
    13. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-488 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Love, James H. & Roper, Stephen & Du, Jun, 2009. "Innovation, ownership and profitability," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 424-434, May.
    15. James Love & Stephen Roper, 2009. "Organizing the Innovation Process: Complementarities in Innovation Networking," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 273-290.
    16. Samira Oukarfi & Maurice Baslé, 2009. "Public-sector financial incentives for business relocation and effectiveness measures based on company profile and geographic zone," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 43(2), pages 509-526, June.
    17. Kokko, Ari & Tingvall, Patrik Gustavsson & Videnord, Josefin, 2015. "The growth effects of R&D spending in the EU: A meta-analysis," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 9, pages 1-26.
    18. A. Lasagni, 2011. "European SMEs, external relationships and innovation: some empirical evidence," Economics Department Working Papers 2011-EP04, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    19. Roberto M Samaniego, 2006. "A Theory of Entry and Exit with Embodied Rate of Technical Change," 2006 Meeting Papers 765, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    20. Naciba Haned & Caroline Mothe & Thuc Uyen Nguyen-Thi, 2014. "Firm persistence in technological innovation: the relevance of organizational innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5-6), pages 490-516, September.
    21. Cigan, Heidi, 2002. "The internet's contribution to progress and growth in Germany: The economic impact of the internet and the price structure of access," HWWA Reports 216, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00516132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.