IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04714330.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What does "sustainable value creation" mean? An ecological accounting approach to sustainable business models

Author

Listed:
  • Eléonore Disse

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

To qualify the sustainability of organizations, the business model approach questions whether it is possible to identify "sustainable value creation" (Lüdecke-Freund, 2020). While the polysemous notion of value was already unclear, its sustainable nature adds a further definitional difficulty. What's more, business model approaches do not enable to precisely address the impact of activities on the values in question. Our aim is to help clarify the sustainable business model approach to company sustainability through the prism of CARE ecological accounting framework (Rambaud & Richard, 2015). Our conceptual approach consists in applying CARE concepts and methodology to an illustrative case study inspired by a real farm business. We highlight how CARE repositions the understanding of sustainability in terms of the ability of a business to preserve human and natural capital while creating value (i.e. selling goods or services to obtain money resources). This reading leads to identify value propositions that consist in providing services that preserve the client's natural or human capitals. While other value propositions ultimately refer to the company's own human or natural capitals preservation. Thus, "sustainability" in business models should be clarified at least between making its own production process sustainable vs. contributing to its client's sustainability. Relying on an ecological accounting framework help designing strategies and activities to reach capital's preservation objectives according to anticipated costs. In the end, such framework can be used to lend credibility to sustainability claims possibly opening the door to the capture of financing solutions or market opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Eléonore Disse, 2024. "What does "sustainable value creation" mean? An ecological accounting approach to sustainable business models," Post-Print hal-04714330, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04714330
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04714330v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04714330v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1444 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mattessich, Richard, 1995. "Conditional-normative accounting methodology: Incorporating value judgments and means-end relations of an applied science," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 259-284, May.
    3. Susan Lambert & Marco Montemari, 2017. "Business Model Research: From Concepts to Theories," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(11), pages 1-41, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Winter, Peter, 2007. "Managerial Risk Accounting and Control – A German perspective," MPRA Paper 8185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Svetlana Samusenko Anatol’evna & Светлана Самусенко Анатольевна, 2017. "Теория Учета: Современные Проблемы И Структурно-Логическаямодель Развития," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, issue 6, pages 20-29.
    3. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    4. Fabio Santini, 2021. "Gli "effetti indesiderati" dell?accounting come "scienza". Riflessioni sulla metodologia di ricerca nel management accounting and control," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(2), pages 171-197.
    5. Marc de Bourmont, 2014. "De l'évaluation des actifs et de la nécessité de développer des outils comptables de « l'après-crise »," Post-Print hal-01899199, HAL.
    6. Deon Montasser & Ruslan Prijadi & Tengku Ezni Balqiah, 2023. "The Mediating Effect of IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Readiness on the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Digital Business Model Innovation: Evidence From Indone," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    7. Klaus Ruhnke & Catharina Schmiele & Jochen Schwind, 2010. "Die Erwartungslücke als permanentes Phänomen der Abschlussprüfung — Definitionsansatz, empirische Untersuchung und Schlussfolgerungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 394-421, June.
    8. Shapiro, B. P., 1998. "Toward a normative model of rational argumentation for critical accounting discussions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 641-663, October.
    9. Sébastien Rocher, 2008. "Les Apports De La Constructive Research Approach A La Pertinence Des Outils De Gestion En Comptabilite Publique," Post-Print halshs-00525963, HAL.
    10. Simon Duindam & Bernard Verstegen, 2000. "Theory for Accounting or Accounting Theory: An Essay on the Interaction between Economics and Accounting," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 125-138, September.
    11. Shapiro, Brian P., 1997. "Objectivity, relativism, and truth in external financial reporting: What's really at stake in the disputes?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 165-185, February.
    12. Mattessich, Richard, 2003. "Accounting representation and the onion model of reality: a comparison with Baudrillard's orders of simulacra and his hyperreality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 443-470, July.
    13. Ahrens, Thomas & Becker, Albrecht & Burns, John & Chapman, Christopher S. & Granlund, Markus & Habersam, Michael & Hansen, Allan & Khalifa, Rihab & Malmi, Teemu & Mennicken, Andrea & Mikes, Anette & P, 2008. "The future of interpretive accounting research—A polyphonic debate," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 840-866.
    14. Viorica Mirela Stefan-Duicu & Adrian Stefan-Duicu, 2019. "Professional EXO-JUDGMENT Perception – a Quantitative Research Based on an Innovative Conceptual Structure. Part II," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 7(2), pages 99-103, December.
    15. Wolfgang Ballwieser, 2019. "Überlegungen zu Theorie und Praxis der Finanzberichterstattung: Herausforderungen, Erkenntnisse und Lücken [Reflections on Theory and Practice of Financial Reporting: Challenges, Scientific Finding," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 169-211, July.
    16. Viorica Mirela Stefan-Duicu & Adrian Stefan-Duicu, 2018. "Professional Exo-Judgment Perception – A Quantitative Research Based On An Innovative Conceptual Structure," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 6(2), pages 17-25, December.
    17. Collin, Sven-Olof Yrjö & Tagesson, Torbjörn & Andersson, Anette & Cato, Joosefin & Hansson, Karin, 2009. "Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 141-174.
    18. Mary A. Malina & Hanne S. O. Nørreklit & Frank H. Selto, 2007. "Relations among Measures, Climate of Control, and Performance Measurement Models," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 935-982, September.
    19. Frederik Möller & Maleen Stachon & Can Azkan & Thorsten Schoormann & Boris Otto, 2022. "Designing business model taxonomies – synthesis and guidance from information systems research," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 701-726, June.
    20. Simon Archer, 1998. "Mattessich's Critique of Accounting: a review article," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 297-316.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ecological accounting; value creation; business models; sustainable business models; natural capital;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04714330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.