IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntu/ntugeo/vol6-iss2-18-017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional Exo-Judgment Perception – A Quantitative Research Based On An Innovative Conceptual Structure

Author

Listed:
  • VIORICA MIRELA STEFAN-DUICU

    („Nicolae Titulescu” University, Bucharest, Romania)

  • ADRIAN STEFAN-DUICU

    (Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims to describe an innovative concept – the professional exo-judgment. This concept implies a wide documentation and presents a high grade of originality. In the development of this article we will expose pilot-notions from the framework of the concept’s explanations followed, in the near future, by a thoroughgoing and exhaustive description of all composing elements. A starting definition is referring to the professional exo-judgment as being a thorough approach of the professional judgment from general to particular, extrapolating the classical notion of professional judgment towards a constructive vision, towards a clear and open presentation and in the end is referring to the description of a concept with an interchangeable form, with influences related to affective and the internal structure of men, description realized through internal – external approach, through these exo-approaches obtaining an exo-judgment.

Suggested Citation

  • Viorica Mirela Stefan-Duicu & Adrian Stefan-Duicu, 2018. "Professional Exo-Judgment Perception – A Quantitative Research Based On An Innovative Conceptual Structure," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 6(2), pages 17-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol6-iss2-18-017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globeco.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_6_no_2/geo_2018_vol6_no2_art_002.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mattessich, Richard, 1995. "Conditional-normative accounting methodology: Incorporating value judgments and means-end relations of an applied science," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 259-284, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viorica Mirela Stefan-Duicu & Mihaela Sudacevschi, 2023. "Placement of the Professional Judgment in the Current Remote Working Environment," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 11(1), pages 126-132, May.
    2. Viorica Mirela Stefan-Duicu & Adrian Stefan-Duicu, 2019. "Professional EXO-JUDGMENT Perception – a Quantitative Research Based on an Innovative Conceptual Structure. Part II," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 7(2), pages 99-103, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Winter, Peter, 2007. "Managerial Risk Accounting and Control – A German perspective," MPRA Paper 8185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Svetlana Samusenko Anatol’evna & Светлана Самусенко Анатольевна, 2017. "Теория Учета: Современные Проблемы И Структурно-Логическаямодель Развития," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, issue 6, pages 20-29.
    3. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    4. Fabio Santini, 2021. "Gli "effetti indesiderati" dell?accounting come "scienza". Riflessioni sulla metodologia di ricerca nel management accounting and control," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(2), pages 171-197.
    5. Marc de Bourmont, 2014. "De l'évaluation des actifs et de la nécessité de développer des outils comptables de « l'après-crise »," Post-Print hal-01899199, HAL.
    6. Klaus Ruhnke & Catharina Schmiele & Jochen Schwind, 2010. "Die Erwartungslücke als permanentes Phänomen der Abschlussprüfung — Definitionsansatz, empirische Untersuchung und Schlussfolgerungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 394-421, June.
    7. Shapiro, B. P., 1998. "Toward a normative model of rational argumentation for critical accounting discussions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 641-663, October.
    8. Sébastien Rocher, 2008. "Les Apports De La Constructive Research Approach A La Pertinence Des Outils De Gestion En Comptabilite Publique," Post-Print halshs-00525963, HAL.
    9. Eléonore Disse, 2024. "What does "sustainable value creation" mean? An ecological accounting approach to sustainable business models," Post-Print hal-04714330, HAL.
    10. Simon Duindam & Bernard Verstegen, 2000. "Theory for Accounting or Accounting Theory: An Essay on the Interaction between Economics and Accounting," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 125-138, September.
    11. Shapiro, Brian P., 1997. "Objectivity, relativism, and truth in external financial reporting: What's really at stake in the disputes?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 165-185, February.
    12. Mattessich, Richard, 2003. "Accounting representation and the onion model of reality: a comparison with Baudrillard's orders of simulacra and his hyperreality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 443-470, July.
    13. Ahrens, Thomas & Becker, Albrecht & Burns, John & Chapman, Christopher S. & Granlund, Markus & Habersam, Michael & Hansen, Allan & Khalifa, Rihab & Malmi, Teemu & Mennicken, Andrea & Mikes, Anette & P, 2008. "The future of interpretive accounting research—A polyphonic debate," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 840-866.
    14. Viorica Mirela Stefan-Duicu & Adrian Stefan-Duicu, 2019. "Professional EXO-JUDGMENT Perception – a Quantitative Research Based on an Innovative Conceptual Structure. Part II," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 7(2), pages 99-103, December.
    15. Wolfgang Ballwieser, 2019. "Überlegungen zu Theorie und Praxis der Finanzberichterstattung: Herausforderungen, Erkenntnisse und Lücken [Reflections on Theory and Practice of Financial Reporting: Challenges, Scientific Finding," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 169-211, July.
    16. Collin, Sven-Olof Yrjö & Tagesson, Torbjörn & Andersson, Anette & Cato, Joosefin & Hansson, Karin, 2009. "Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 141-174.
    17. Mary A. Malina & Hanne S. O. Nørreklit & Frank H. Selto, 2007. "Relations among Measures, Climate of Control, and Performance Measurement Models," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 935-982, September.
    18. Simon Archer, 1998. "Mattessich's Critique of Accounting: a review article," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 297-316.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol6-iss2-18-017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefan Ciucu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuntro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.