IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04687303.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

SMEs versus Amazon: Is the choice of Amazon as the benchmark e-commerce site inevitable?
[PME versus Amazon : Le choix d’Amazon comme site marchand de référence est-il une fatalité ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitri Laroutis

    (CARE - Centre d'Analyse et de Recherche en Économie - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université, LECOR - Laboratoire d'Economie Rurale - ESITPA - École supérieure d'ingénieurs et de techniciens pour l'agriculture, Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie)

  • Philippe Boistel

    (CERM - Centre de recherche en Risk Management)

  • Max Poulain

    (NIMEC - Normandie Innovation Marché Entreprise Consommation - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - ULH - Université Le Havre Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

Abstract

With 350 million product references, Amazon is a global e-commerce company which remains omnipresent in a wide range of sectors. We wanted to identify the factors that explain the choice of econsumers in their buying process. Why do they choose Amazon over another commercial site? How can SMEs improve their differentiation against competition from Amazon? Based on a survey conducted among 191 Internet shoppers, we were able to build a model explaining the choice of e-consumers regarding their preferences in terms of consuming online. We thus identified 14 significant variables explaining the behaviour of an e-consumer in his choice of an online commercial site, with influences ranging from -30.38% to +41.5% in the propensity of individuals to choose Amazon.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitri Laroutis & Philippe Boistel & Max Poulain, 2024. "SMEs versus Amazon: Is the choice of Amazon as the benchmark e-commerce site inevitable? [PME versus Amazon : Le choix d’Amazon comme site marchand de référence est-il une fatalité ?]," Post-Print hal-04687303, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04687303
    DOI: 10.53102/2024.38.02.1137
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04687303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04687303/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.53102/2024.38.02.1137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Yeolib & Peterson, Robert A., 2017. "A Meta-analysis of Online Trust Relationships in E-commerce," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 44-54.
    2. YU, Jie & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Ning, Kun & Edwards, David, 2015. "Product delivery service provider selection and customer satisfaction in the era of internet of things: A Chinese e-retailers’ perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 104-116.
    3. Chatpong Tangmanee, 2017. "Comparisons of Website Visit Behavior between Purchase Outcomes and Product Categories," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 6(4), pages 01-10, July.
    4. Mohd Suki, Norazah & Mohd Suki, Norbayah, 2017. "Modeling the determinants of consumers' attitudes toward online group buying: Do risks and trusts matters?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 180-188.
    5. Gerald Häubl & Valerie Trifts, 2000. "Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 4-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ming-Yan Wang & Peng-Zhu Zhang & Cheng-Yang Zhou & Neng-Ye Lai, 2019. "Effect of Emotion, Expectation, and Privacy on Purchase Intention in WeChat Health Product Consumption: The Mediating Role of Trust," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. März, Armin & Lachner, Michael & Heumann, Christian G. & Schumann, Jan H. & von Wangenheim, Florian, 2021. "How You Remind Me! The Influence of Mobile Push Notifications on Success Rates in Last-Minute Bidding," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-24.
    3. Moriuchi, Emi & Takahashi, Ikuo, 2022. "The role of perceived value, trust and engagement in the C2C online secondary marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 76-88.
    4. Miguel Godinho de Matos & Pedro Ferreira, 2020. "The Effect of Binge-Watching on the Subscription of Video on Demand: Results from Randomized Experiments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1337-1360, December.
    5. Anthony Dukes & Lin Liu, 2016. "Online Shopping Intermediaries: The Strategic Design of Search Environments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1064-1077, April.
    6. Isabelle Brun & Lova Rajaobelina & Line Ricard & Annick Fortin, 2017. "Impact of website characteristics on relationship quality: a comparison of banks financial cooperatives," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 141-149, December.
    7. Joerß, Tom & Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Akbar, Payam, 2021. "Digitalization as solution to environmental problems? When users rely on augmented reality-recommendation agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 510-523.
    8. Teo, Thompson S. H. & Yeong, Yon Ding, 2003. "Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 349-363, October.
    9. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Gökçe Esenduran & James A. Hill & In Joon Noh, 2020. "Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1188-1211, May.
    11. Poushneh, Atieh, 2021. "How close do we feel to virtual product to make a purchase decision? Impact of perceived proximity to virtual product and temporal purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    13. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Alojz Krapež, 2016. "A Complex View of Industry 4.0," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, June.
    14. Nardi, Vinicius Antonio Machado & Jardim, William Carvalho & Ladeira, Wagner Júnior & Santini, Fernando, 2020. "A meta-analysis of the relationship between customer participation and brand outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 450-460.
    15. Ana Alina Tudoran, 2022. "A machine learning approach to identifying decision-making styles for managing customer relationships," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 351-374, March.
    16. Aby Abraham & Sanjay Patro, 2014. "‘Country-of-Origin’ Effect and Consumer Decision-making," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(3), pages 309-318, August.
    17. Fengchun Tang, 2020. "The more interactivity the better? Investigating interactivity, task complexity, and product knowledge in online purchase decisions," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 179-189, September.
    18. Barney Tan & Cheng Yi & Hock C. Chan, 2015. "Research Note—Deliberation Without Attention: The Latent Benefits of Distracting Website Features for Online Purchase Decisions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 437-455, June.
    19. Shiri Melumad & Rhonda Hadi & Christian Hildebrand & Adrian F. Ward, 2020. "Technology-Augmented Choice: How Digital Innovations Are Transforming Consumer Decision Processes," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 7(3), pages 90-101, October.
    20. Junming Liu & Weiwei Chen & Jingyuan Yang & Hui Xiong & Can Chen, 2022. "Iterative Prediction-and-Optimization for E-Logistics Distribution Network Design," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 769-789, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04687303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.