IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04630350.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Toxibees: Methodology For Scoring Molecules From The Toxibees Tool
[Toxibees : Methodologie De Notation Des Molecules De L’Outil Toxibees]

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Marc Bonmatin

    (CBM - Centre de biophysique moléculaire - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - INC-CNRS - Institut de Chimie - CNRS Chimie - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • L.P. Belzunces

    (AE - Abeilles et Environnement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Cyril Vidau

    (ITSAP - Institut de l'abeille)

  • Amélie Bajolet

    (Association Bee Friendly)

  • Elodie Nguyen

    (Association Bee Friendly)

Abstract

Toxibees is based on a system of rating different criteria. In total, ten criteria are analysed, four of which characterise the toxicity of the molecule, or in other words its intrinsic danger, and six of which characterise the behaviour of the molecule in the environment, making it possible to qualify the risk of bees being exposed to the molecule. All these criteria are important to take into account if we are to reliably estimate the actual toxicity of a molecule. A molecule poses a risk to bees if it is toxic and if bees are exposed to it. The toxiscore increments the scores obtained for each criterion, to which a weighting factor is added.The methodology is transparent and can be freely consulted by downloading the document: https://toxibees.certifiedbeefriendly.org/IMG/pdf/presentation_de_la_methodologie_de_notation_version_finale.pdf.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Marc Bonmatin & L.P. Belzunces & Cyril Vidau & Amélie Bajolet & Elodie Nguyen, 2023. "Toxibees: Methodology For Scoring Molecules From The Toxibees Tool [Toxibees : Methodologie De Notation Des Molecules De L’Outil Toxibees]," Post-Print hal-04630350, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04630350
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04630350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04630350/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard J. Gill & Oscar Ramos-Rodriguez & Nigel E. Raine, 2012. "Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees," Nature, Nature, vol. 491(7422), pages 105-108, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. PK Gupta, 2018. "An Assessment of Relative Risks to Human/Ecological Health Biotech Crops versus Other Human Activities," Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research, Lupine Publishers, LLC, vol. 1(2), pages 51-62, February.
    2. Patricia A. Henríquez-Piskulich & Constanza Schapheer & Nicolas J. Vereecken & Cristian Villagra, 2021. "Agroecological Strategies to Safeguard Insect Pollinators in Biodiversity Hotspots: Chile as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Kleczkowski, Adam & Ellis, Ciaran & Hanley, Nick & Goulson, David, 2017. "Pesticides and bees: Ecological-economic modelling of bee populations on farmland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 53-62.
    4. Mack, G. & Finger, R. & Ammann, J. & El Benni, N., 2023. "Modelling policies towards pesticide-free agricultural production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    5. Aneta Bokšová & Jan Kazda & Martina Stejskalová & Tomáš Šubrt & Leoš Uttl & Petr Mráz & Jan Bartoška, 2021. "Findings of herbicide and fungicide residues in bee bread," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 343-352.
    6. Lauren Brzozowski & Michael Mazourek, 2018. "A Sustainable Agricultural Future Relies on the Transition to Organic Agroecological Pest Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Caleb Kiplimo Bett, 2017. "Factors Influencing Quality Honey Production," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(11), pages 281-292, November.
    8. Lauren C. Ponisio & Paul R. Ehrlich, 2016. "Diversification, Yield and a New Agricultural Revolution: Problems and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Liu, Wenjing & Wang, Jingsheng & Li, Chao & Chen, Baoxiong & Sun, Yufang, 2019. "Using Bibliometric Analysis to Understand the Recent Progress in Agroecosystem Services Research," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 293-305.
    10. Banks, H.T. & Banks, J.E. & Bommarco, Riccardo & Laubmeier, A.N. & Myers, N.J. & Rundlöf, Maj & Tillman, Kristen, 2017. "Modeling bumble bee population dynamics with delay differential equations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 14-23.
    11. G. Kleftodimos & N. Gallai & Ch. Kephaliacos, 2021. "Ecological-economic modeling of pollination complexity and pesticide use in agricultural crops," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 297-323, October.
    12. Berthet, Elsa T. & Bretagnolle, Vincent & Gaba, Sabrina, 2022. "Place-based social-ecological research is crucial for designing collective management of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    13. A Strouhova & J Velisek & A Stara, 2023. "Selected neonicotinoids and associated risk for aquatic organisms," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(8), pages 313-336.
    14. Patricia P.A. Henríquez‐piskulich & Constanza Schapheer & Nicolas Vereecken & Cristian Villagra, 2021. "Agroecological strategies to safeguard insect pollinators in biodiversity hotspots: Chile as a case study," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/328659, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Ullrika Sahlin & Maj Rundlöf, 2017. "Differences in the strengths of evidence matters in risk–risk trade-offs," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 988-994, August.
    16. Luciano Pilati & Mario Prestamburgo, 2016. "Sequential Relationship between Profitability and Sustainability: The Case of Migratory Beekeeping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, January.
    17. Daria Ilić & Boris Brkić & Maja Turk Sekulić, 2024. "Biomonitoring: Developing a Beehive Air Volatiles Profile as an Indicator of Environmental Contamination Using a Sustainable In-Field Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-11, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Toxiscore; abeille; pesticides; environnement; toxicité;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04630350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.