IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04614845.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Finance or Public Choice? Scholastic Political Economy as an Essentialist Synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammadhosein Bahmanpour-Khalesi

    (Imam Sadiq University)

  • Mohammadjavad Sharifzadeh

    (Imam Sadiq University)

Abstract

Nowadays, it is thought that there are only two approaches to political economy: public finance and public choice; however, this research aims to introduce a new insight by investigating scholastic sources. We study the relevant classic books from the thirteenth to the seventeenth centuries and reevaluate the scholastic literature based on public finance and public choice doctrines. The findings confirm that the government is the institution for realizing the common good according to a scholastic attitude. Therefore, scholastic thinkers saw a typical government mission based on their essentialist attitude toward human happiness. Social conflicts and lack of social consent are the product of diversification in ends and desires; hence, if the ends of humans were unified, there would be no conflict of interest. Accordingly, if the government acts according to its assigned mission, the lack of public consent is not significant. Based on the scholastic point of view, this study introduces the third approach to political economy, which can be considered an analytical synthesis of classical doctrines.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammadhosein Bahmanpour-Khalesi & Mohammadjavad Sharifzadeh, 2024. "Public Finance or Public Choice? Scholastic Political Economy as an Essentialist Synthesis," Post-Print hal-04614845, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04614845
    DOI: 10.52547/jep.5.1.217
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04614845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04614845/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.52547/jep.5.1.217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Downs, 1957. "An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(2), pages 135-135.
    2. Alain Marciano, 2005. "Benevolence, Sympathy, and Hume's Model of Government: How Different Is New Political Economy from Classical Political Economy?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 37(5), pages 43-70, Supplemen.
    3. Gary M. Anderson, 1989. "The Butcher, the Baker, and the Policy-Maker: Adam Smith on Public Choice, with a Reply by Stigler," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 641-659, Winter.
    4. Steven G. Medema, 2007. "The Hesitant Hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the Evolution of the Theory of Market Failure," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 331-358, Fall.
    5. Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1989. "Markets, Market Failures, and Development," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(2), pages 197-203, May.
    6. Laurence S. Moss, 1991. "Thomas Hobbes's Influence on David Hume: The Emergence of a Public Choice Tradition," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 587-612, Winter.
    7. Laurence S. Moss, 1977. "Some Public-Choice Aspects of Hobbes's Political Thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 256-272, Summer.
    8. Niehans, Jürg, 1993. "A Reassessment of Scholastic Monetary Theory," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 229-248, October.
    9. Odd Langholm, 1982. "Economic Freedom in Scholastic Thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 260-283, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammadhosein Bahmanpour-Khalesi & Mohammadjavad Sharifzadeh, 2023. "Public Finance or Public Choice? The Scholastic Political Economy As an Essentialist Synthesis," Papers 2306.11049, arXiv.org.
    2. Gospodarowicz, Marcin & Grochowska, Renata & Judzińska, Agnieszka & Łopaciuk, Wiesław & Manko, Stanislaw & Oliński, Marian & Wasilewski, Adam & Wigier, Marek, 2013. "CAP implementation in Poland - state and perspectives," Multiannual Program Reports 179500, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    3. Laurence S. Moss, 2010. "Hobbes and the Early Uses of Economic Method," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 499-523, January.
    4. Chechelski, Piotr & Grochowska, Renata & Łopaciuk, Wiesław & Ślązak, Emil & Wasilewski, Adam & Wigier, Marek, 2012. "Development est public policy support in the food economy – the example of Poland," Multiannual Program Reports 164845, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    5. Laurence S. Moss, 2010. "Finding New Wine in Old Bottles: What Historians Must Do When Leontief Coefficients Are No Longer the Designated Drivers of Economics," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 431-460, January.
    6. Jonathan Anomaly, 2015. "Public goods and government action," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 14(2), pages 109-128, May.
    7. Daniel D’Amico, 2012. "Comparative political economy when anarchism is on the table," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 63-75, March.
    8. Christophe Crombez, 2004. "Introduction," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 16(3), pages 227-231, July.
    9. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    10. Kaivan Munshi & Mark Rosenzweig, 2008. "The Efficacy of Parochial Politics: Caste, Commitment, and Competence in Indian Local Governments," NBER Working Papers 14335, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Navin Kartik & Francesco Squintani & Katrin Tinn, 2024. "Information Revelation and Pandering in Elections," Papers 2406.17084, arXiv.org.
    12. Burkhard Schipper & Hee Yeul Woo, 2012. "Political Awareness and Microtargeting of Voters in Electoral Competition," Working Papers 124, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    13. Marco Faravelli & Randall Walsh, 2011. "Smooth Politicians And Paternalistic Voters: A Theory Of Large Elections," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000250, David K. Levine.
    14. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith & Neil J. Mitchell & Kerry G. Herron, 2004. "Foreign and Domestic Policy Belief Structures in the U.S. and British Publics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(3), pages 287-309, June.
    15. Eric Kaufmann & Henry Patterson, 2006. "Intra‐Party Support for the Good Friday Agreement in the Ulster Unionist Party," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(3), pages 509-532, October.
    16. Micael Castanheira, 2003. "Why Vote For Losers?," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(5), pages 1207-1238, September.
    17. Chatterjee, Rittwik & Chattopadhyay, Srobonti, 2015. "Competition and Auctioning Licenses," MPRA Paper 67086, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Peter J. Coughlin, 2015. "Probabilistic voting in models of electoral competition," Chapters, in: Jac C. Heckelman & Nicholas R. Miller (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Voting, chapter 13, pages 218-234, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Mihir Bhattacharya, 2019. "Constitutionally consistent voting rules over single-peaked domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(2), pages 225-246, February.
    20. Arun Natarajan Hariharan & Arindam Biswas, 2020. "A Critical review of the Indian knowledge‐based industry location policy against its theoretical arguments," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 431-454, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Scholastic Economics; Essentialism; Political Economy; Public Finance; Public Choice; Arrow's impossibility;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04614845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.