IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03960584.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bias due to re-used databases: Coding in hospital for extremely vulnerable patients

Author

Listed:
  • Carine Milcent

    (PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) are intended to reduce healthcare costs and improve the quality of care. Nevertheless, usability issues common to EHRs have been identified. In this paper, we investigate these usability issues for social vulnerability codes. Using the acute care EHR and the rehabilitation care EHR databases, hospital stays of 800'000 patients are studied. This article highlights the differences in coding processes between public and private institutions observed when there are different incentives to code. Furthermore, it shows that the differences in coding are not random but depend on the coding strategy. This article emphasises that the reuse of data leads to biases in interpretation. Using the example of social vulnerability alerts policymakers to the need to consider these differences in coding processes when decisions are based on EHR information. Otherwise, this process of coding differences in social vulnerability may exacerbate social inequalities rather than reduce them.

Suggested Citation

  • Carine Milcent, 2024. "Bias due to re-used databases: Coding in hospital for extremely vulnerable patients," Post-Print hal-03960584, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03960584
    DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100851
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03960584v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03960584v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leemore S. Dafny, 2005. "How Do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(5), pages 1525-1547, December.
    2. Carine Milcent, 2021. "Rehabilitation Care: Performance and Ownership," PSE Working Papers halshs-03010949, HAL.
    3. Fisher, E.S. & Whaley, F.S. & Krushat, W.M. & Malenka, D.J. & Fleming, C. & Baron, J.A. & Hsia, D.C., 1992. "The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: Progress has been made, but problems remain," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(2), pages 243-248.
    4. Kjartan Sarheim Anthun & Johan Håkon Bjørngaard & Jon Magnussen, 2017. "Economic incentives and diagnostic coding in a public health care system," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 83-101, March.
    5. Silverman, Elaine & Skinner, Jonathan, 2004. "Medicare upcoding and hospital ownership," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 369-389, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-03960584 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kjartan Sarheim Anthun, 2022. "Predicting diagnostic coding in hospitals: individual level effects of price incentives," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 129-146, June.
    3. Cook, Amanda & Averett, Susan, 2020. "Do hospitals respond to changing incentive structures? Evidence from Medicare’s 2007 DRG restructuring," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Kjartan Sarheim Anthun & Johan Håkon Bjørngaard & Jon Magnussen, 2017. "Economic incentives and diagnostic coding in a public health care system," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 83-101, March.
    5. Adam Powell & Sergei Savin & Nicos Savva, 2012. "Physician Workload and Hospital Reimbursement: Overworked Physicians Generate Less Revenue per Patient," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 512-528, October.
    6. Bowblis John R. & Brunt Christopher S. & Grabowski David C., 2016. "Competitive Spillovers and Regulatory Exploitation by Skilled Nursing Facilities," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 45-70, June.
    7. Christopher S. Brunt, 2015. "Medicare Part B Intensity and Volume Offset," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(8), pages 1009-1026, August.
    8. Diane Alexander, 2017. "How do Doctors Respond to Incentives? Unintended Consequences of Paying Doctors to Reduce Costs," Working Paper Series WP-2017-9, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    9. Buczak-Stec, Elżbieta & Goryński, Paweł & Nitsch-Osuch, Aneta & Kanecki, Krzysztof & Tyszko, Piotr, 2017. "The impact of introducing a new hospital financing system (DRGs) in Poland on hospitalisations for atherosclerosis: An interrupted time series analysis (2004–2012)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(11), pages 1186-1193.
    10. Carine Milcent, 2016. "Upcoding and heterogeneity in hospitals’ response: A Natural Experiment," PSE Working Papers halshs-01340557, HAL.
    11. Berta, Paolo & Callea, Giuditta & Martini, Gianmaria & Vittadini, Giorgio, 2010. "The effects of upcoding, cream skimming and readmissions on the Italian hospitals efficiency: A population-based investigation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 812-821, July.
    12. Li‐Lin Liang, 2015. "Do Diagnosis‐Related Group‐Based Payments Incentivise Hospitals to Adjust Output Mix?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 454-469, April.
    13. Gautam Gowrisankaran & Keith A. Joiner & Jianjing Lin, 2016. "How do Hospitals Respond to Payment Incentives?," NBER Working Papers 22873, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Lai, Yi & Fu, Hongqiao & Li, Ling & Yip, Winnie, 2022. "Hospital response to a case-based payment scheme under regional global budget: The case of Guangzhou in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    15. Benedic N. Ippolito, 2016. "Financial incentives, hospital care, and health outcomes: Evidence from fair pricing laws," AEI Economics Working Papers 863745, American Enterprise Institute.
    16. Berta, P.; & Martini, G.; & Piacenza, M.; & Turati, G.;, 2019. "The strange case of appropriate C-sections:DRG-tariff regulation, hospital ownership, and market concentration," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 19/02, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    17. Jurgita Januleviciute & Jan Erik Askildsen & Oddvar Kaarboe & Luigi Siciliani & Matt Sutton, 2016. "How do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes? Evidence from Norway," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(5), pages 620-636, May.
    18. Carine Milcent, 2019. "From downcoding to upcoding: DRG based payment in hospitals," Working Papers halshs-02317416, HAL.
    19. Carine Milcent, 2021. "From downcoding to upcoding: DRG based payment in hospitals," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-26, March.
    20. Gian Paolo Barbetta & Gilberto Turati & Angelo M. Zago, 2007. "Behavioral differences between public and private not‐for‐profit hospitals in the Italian national health service," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 75-96, January.
    21. Simon B. Spika & Peter Zweifel, 2019. "Buying efficiency: optimal hospital payment in the presence of double upcoding," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03960584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.