How serious is the measurement-error problem in risk-aversion tasks?
Author
Abstract
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-021-09366-5
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Other versions of this item:
- Fabien Perez & Guillaume Hollard & Radu Vranceanu, 2021. "How serious is the measurement-error problem in risk-aversion tasks?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 319-342, December.
- Fabien Perez & Guillaume Hollard & Radu Vranceanu, 2021. "How Serious is the Measurement-Error Problem in Risk-Aversion Tasks?," Working Papers 2021-13, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
References listed on IDEAS
- Tamás Csermely & Alexander Rabas, 2016. "How to reveal people’s preferences: Comparing time consistency and predictive power of multiple price list risk elicitation methods," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 107-136, December.
- John Hey & Andrea Morone & Ulrich Schmidt, 2009.
"Noise and bias in eliciting preferences,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 213-235, December.
- Hey, John Denis & Morone, Andrea & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2007. "Noise and bias in eliciting preferences," Kiel Working Papers 1386, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
- John D Hey & Andrea Morone & Ulrich Schmidt, 2007. "Noise and Bias in Eliciting Preferences," Discussion Papers 07/04, Department of Economics, University of York.
- Eva Wölbert & Arno Riedl, 2013.
"Measuring Time and Risk Preferences: Realiability, Stability, Domain Specificity,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
4339, CESifo.
- Wölbert, E.M. & Riedl, A.M., 2013. "Measuring time and risk preferences: Reliability, stability, domain specificity," Research Memorandum 041, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
- Ben Gillen & Erik Snowberg & Leeat Yariv, 2019. "Experimenting with Measurement Error: Techniques with Applications to the Caltech Cohort Study," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(4), pages 1826-1863.
- Giuseppe Attanasi & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Valentina Rotondi & Daria Vigani, 2018.
"Lottery- and survey-based risk attitudes linked through a multichoice elicitation task,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 341-372, May.
- Giuseppe Attanasi & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Valentina Rotondi & Daria Vigani, 2016. "Lottery- and survey-based risk attitudes linked through a multichoice elicitation task," Working Papers of BETA 2016-24, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
- Giuseppe Attanasi & Nikolaos Georgantzis & Valentina Rotondi & Daria Vigani, 2018. "Lottery- and survey-based risk attitudes linked through a multichoice elicitation task," Post-Print halshs-01948205, HAL.
- Paolo Crosetto & Antonio Filippin, 2016. "A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 19(3), pages 613-641, September.
- Paolo Crosetto & Antonio Filippin, 2013.
"The “bomb” risk elicitation task,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 31-65, August.
- Paolo Crosetto & Antonio Filippin, 2012. "The "Bomb" Risk Elicitation Task," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-035, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
- Crosetto, Paolo & Filippin, Antonio, 2012. "The "Bomb" Risk Elicitation Task," IZA Discussion Papers 6710, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Paolo Crosetto & Antonio Filippin, 2012. "The "Bomb" Risk Elicitation Task," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 517, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
- Engel, Christoph & Kirchkamp, Oliver, 2019. "How to deal with inconsistent choices on multiple price lists," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 138-157.
- Deck, Cary & Lee, Jungmin & Reyes, Javier A. & Rosen, Christopher C., 2013. "A failed attempt to explain within subject variation in risk taking behavior using domain specific risk attitudes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-24.
- Charles A. Holt & Susan K. Laury, 2002. "Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1644-1655, December.
- Uwe Dulleck & Jonas Fooken & Jacob Fell, 2015.
"Within-Subject Intra- and Inter-Method Consistency of Two Experimental Risk Attitude Elicitation Methods,"
German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 16(1), pages 104-121, February.
- Dulleck Uwe & Fooken Jonas & Fell Jacob, 2015. "Within-Subject Intra- and Inter-Method Consistency of Two Experimental Risk Attitude Elicitation Methods," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 104-121, February.
- Gary Charness & Thomas Garcia & Theo Offerman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2020.
"Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 99-123, April.
- Gary Charness & Thomas Garcia & Theo Offerman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2019. "Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?," Working Papers halshs-02146618, HAL.
- Gary Charness & Thomas Garcia & Theo Offerman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2020. "Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?," Post-Print halshs-02908109, HAL.
- Gary Charness & Thomas Garcia & Theo Offerman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2019. "Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?," Working Papers 1921, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Charness, Gary & Garcia, Thomas & Offerman, Theo & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2019. "Do Measures of Risk Attitude in the Laboratory Predict Behavior under Risk in and outside of the Laboratory?," IZA Discussion Papers 12395, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Lönnqvist, Jan-Erik & Verkasalo, Markku & Walkowitz, Gari & Wichardt, Philipp C., 2015. "Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: Task or ask? An empirical comparison," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 254-266.
- Andreas Pedroni & Renato Frey & Adrian Bruhin & Gilles Dutilh & Ralph Hertwig & Jörg Rieskamp, 2017. "The risk elicitation puzzle," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(11), pages 803-809, November.
- Pavlo R. Blavatskyy & Hela Maafi, 2018. "Estimating representations of time preferences and models of probabilistic intertemporal choice on experimental data," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 259-287, June.
- Ted O'Donoghue & Jason Somerville, 2018. "Modeling Risk Aversion in Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(2), pages 91-114, Spring.
- Chuang, Yating & Schechter, Laura, 2015. "Stability of experimental and survey measures of risk, time, and social preferences: A review and some new results," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 151-170.
- Aurora García-Gallego & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Daniel Navarro-Martínez & Gerardo Sabater-Grande, 2011. "The stochastic component in choice and regression to the mean," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 251-267, August.
- Sabater-Grande, Gerardo & Georgantzis, Nikolaos, 2002. "Accounting for risk aversion in repeated prisoners' dilemma games: an experimental test," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 37-50, May.
- Steffen Andersen & Glenn W. Harrison & Morten I. Lau & E. Elisabet Rutström, 2008. "Lost In State Space: Are Preferences Stable?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 49(3), pages 1091-1112, August.
- Jonathan P. Beauchamp & David Cesarini & Magnus Johannesson, 2017. "The psychometric and empirical properties of measures of risk preferences," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 203-237, June.
- Rui Mata & Renato Frey & David Richter & Jürgen Schupp & Ralph Hertwig, 2018. "Risk Preference: A View from Psychology," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(2), pages 155-172, Spring.
- Sarah Jacobson & Ragan Petrie, 2009. "Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 143-158, April.
- Stephan Meier & Charles D. Sprenger, 2015. "Temporal Stability of Time Preferences," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(2), pages 273-286, May.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Héloise Cloléry & Guillaume Hollard & Fabien Perez & Inès Picard, 2022. "Should we trust measures of trust?," Working Papers 2022-13, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Holzmeister, Felix & Stefan, Matthias, 2019. "The Risk Elicitation Puzzle Revisited: Across-Methods (In)consistency?," OSF Preprints pj9u2, Center for Open Science.
- Felix Holzmeister & Matthias Stefan, 2019. "The risk elicitation puzzle revisited: Across-methods (in)consistency?," Working Papers 2019-19, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
- Fabien Perez & Guillaume Hollard & Radu Vranceanu & Delphine Dubart, 2019.
"How Serious is the Measurement-Error Problem in a Popular Risk-Aversion Task?,"
Working Papers
hal-02291224, HAL.
- Fabien, Perez & Guillaume, Hollard & Radu, Vranceanu & Delphine, Dubart, 2019. "How Serious is the Measurement-Error Problem in a Popular Risk-Aversion Task?," ESSEC Working Papers WP1911, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
- Fabien Perez & Guillaume Hollard & Radu Vranceanu & Delphine Dubart, 2019. "How Serious is the Measurement-Error Problem in a Popular Risk-Aversion Task?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-02291224, HAL.
- Felix Holzmeister & Matthias Stefan, 2021. "The risk elicitation puzzle revisited: Across-methods (in)consistency?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 593-616, June.
- Galizzi, Matteo M. & Machado, Sara R. & Miniaci, Raffaele, 2016. "Temporal stability, cross-validity, and external validity of risk preferences measures: experimental evidence from a UK representative sample," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67554, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Tamás Csermely & Alexander Rabas, 2016. "How to reveal people’s preferences: Comparing time consistency and predictive power of multiple price list risk elicitation methods," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 107-136, December.
- Rafaï, Ismaël & Blayac, Thierry & Dubois, Dimitri & Duchêne, Sébastien & Nguyen-Van, Phu & Ventelou, Bruno & Willinger, Marc, 2023.
"Stated preferences outperform elicited preferences for predicting reported compliance with COVID-19 prophylactic measures,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
- Ismaël Rafaï & Thierry Blayac & Dimitri Dubois & Sébastien Duchêne & Phu Nguyen-Van & Bruno Ventelou & Marc Willinger, 2023. "Stated preferences outperform elicited preferences for predicting reported compliance with Covid-19 prophylactic measures," Post-Print hal-04192470, HAL.
- Ismaël Rafaï & Thierry Blayac & Dimitri Dubois & Sebastien Duchene & Phu Nguyen-Van & Bruno Ventelou & Marc Willinger, 2023. "Stated preferences outperform elicited preferences for predicting reported compliance with Covid-19 prophylactic measures," Working Papers hal-04219784, HAL.
- Phu Nguyen-Van & Thierry Blayac & Dimitri Dubois & Sebastien Duchene & Bruno Ventelou & Marc Willinger, 2023. "Stated preferences outperform elicited preferences for predicting reported compliance with Covid-19 prophylactic measures," EconomiX Working Papers 2023-27, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
- Gary Charness & Thomas Garcia & Theo Offerman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2020.
"Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 99-123, April.
- Gary Charness & Thomas Garcia & Theo Offerman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2019. "Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?," Working Papers halshs-02146618, HAL.
- Gary Charness & Thomas Garcia & Theo Offerman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2020. "Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?," Post-Print halshs-02908109, HAL.
- Charness, Gary & Garcia, Thomas & Offerman, Theo & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2019. "Do Measures of Risk Attitude in the Laboratory Predict Behavior under Risk in and outside of the Laboratory?," IZA Discussion Papers 12395, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Gary Charness & Thomas Garcia & Theo Offerman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2019. "Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?," Working Papers 1921, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Ranganathan, Kavitha & Lejarraga, Tomás, 2021. "Elicitation of risk preferences through satisficing," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
- Jonathan Chapman & Erik Snowberg & Stephanie Wang & Colin Camerer, 2018.
"Loss Attitudes in the U.S. Population: Evidence from Dynamically Optimized Sequential Experimentation (DOSE),"
NBER Working Papers
25072, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Jonathan Chapman & Erik Snowberg & Stephanie Wang & Colin Camerer, 2018. "Loss Attitudes in the U.S. Population: Evidence from Dynamically Optimized Sequential Experimentation (DOSE)," CESifo Working Paper Series 7262, CESifo.
- Dasgupta, Utteeyo & Gangadharan, Lata & Maitra, Pushkar & Mani, Subha, 2017. "Searching for preference stability in a state dependent world," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 17-32.
- Michele Garagnani, 2023.
"The predictive power of risk elicitation tasks,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 165-192, October.
- Michele Garagnani, 2020. "The predictive power of risk elicitation tasks," ECON - Working Papers 362, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:234-279 is not listed on IDEAS
- Giuseppe Attanasi & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Valentina Rotondi & Daria Vigani, 2018.
"Lottery- and survey-based risk attitudes linked through a multichoice elicitation task,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 341-372, May.
- Giuseppe Attanasi & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Valentina Rotondi & Daria Vigani, 2016. "Lottery- and survey-based risk attitudes linked through a multichoice elicitation task," Working Papers of BETA 2016-24, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
- Giuseppe Attanasi & Nikolaos Georgantzis & Valentina Rotondi & Daria Vigani, 2018. "Lottery- and survey-based risk attitudes linked through a multichoice elicitation task," Post-Print halshs-01948205, HAL.
- Menkhoff, Lukas & Sakha, Sahra, 2017.
"Estimating risky behavior with multiple-item risk measures,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 59-86.
- Lukas Menkhoff & Sahra Sakha, 2016. "Estimating Risky Behavior with Multiple-Item Risk Measures," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1608, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
- Friedman, Daniel & Habib, Sameh & James, Duncan & Williams, Brett, 2022. "Varieties of risk preference elicitation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 58-76.
- Lau Lilleholt, 2019. "Cognitive ability and risk aversion: A systematic review and meta analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(3), pages 234-279, May.
- Anwesha Bandyopadhyay & Lutfunnahar Begum & Philip J. Grossman, 2021. "Gender differences in the stability of risk attitudes," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 169-201, October.
- Andreas C. Drichoutis & Achilleas Vassilopoulos, 2021. "Intertemporal stability of survey‐based measures of risk and time preferences," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 655-683, August.
- Gürdal, Mehmet Y. & Kuzubaş, Tolga U. & Saltoğlu, Burak, 2017.
"Measures of individual risk attitudes and portfolio choice: Evidence from pension participants,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 186-203.
- Mehmet Y. Gürdal & Tolga U. Kuzubaþ & Burak Saltoðlu, 2016. "Measures of Individual Risk Attitudes and Portfolio Choice: Evidence from Pension Participants," Working Papers 2016/02, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
More about this item
JEL classification:
- C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
- C26 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
- C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
- D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03834842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.