IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03701434.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Accompagner la génération d'idées : expérimenter un leader défixateur en cas de fixations hétérogènes

Author

Listed:
  • Justine Boudier

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Pascal Le Masson

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Benoit Weil

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Le phénomène de fixation, correspondant à la propension des individus à mobiliser des connaissances faciles d'accès, a largement été étudié par la littérature sur la créativité individuelle. Or, dans un contexte organisationnel où les équipes sont pluridisciplinaires, les leaders doivent gérer la diversité cognitive des membres de leurs équipes pour atteindre des résultats créatifs, et donc également une diversité dans les fixations. Cette étude a pour but de s'interroger sur les capacités des leaders à reconnaitre l'hétérogénéité des fixations des membres de leurs équipes et à s'y adapter pour les guider vers des résultats créatifs. Nous avons mis en place un protocole expérimental où des leaders donnent des feedbacks directifs sur des idées proposées dans le cadre d'une tâche de créativité dans le but d'atteindre des idées créatives. Nos analyses ont permis de mettre en évidence différents phénomènes qui ont conduit à une meilleure défixation dans le cas de fixations hétérogènes. En effet, les participants dans notre expérience ont eu tendance à rejeter certaines idées qu'ils considéraient comme créatives et à accepter certaines idées qu'ils considéraient comme classiques. Dans le cas de notre étude, selon l'hétérogénéité des fixations que nous avons construite, la défixation a donc été plus facile pour les leaders ayant des fixations hétérogènes par rapport à celles des concepteurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Justine Boudier & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2022. "Accompagner la génération d'idées : expérimenter un leader défixateur en cas de fixations hétérogènes," Post-Print hal-03701434, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03701434
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-03701434v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-03701434v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armand Hatchuel & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2017. "C-K Theory : Modelling Creative Thinking And Its Impact On Research," Post-Print hal-01619990, HAL.
    2. Isabelle Bouty & Marie-Léandre Gomez & Marc Stierand, 2018. "The creative leadership practices of haute cuisine chefs," Post-Print hal-01921233, HAL.
    3. Hicham Ezzat & Marine Agogué & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Mathieu Cassotti, 2018. "Specificity and Abstraction of Examples: Opposite Effects on Fixation for Creative Ideation," Post-Print halshs-01797385, HAL.
    4. Karan Girotra & Christian Terwiesch & Karl T. Ulrich, 2010. "Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 591-605, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan, 2013. "Do firms face a trade-off between the quantity and the quality of their inventions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1072-1079.
    2. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    3. Barry L. Bayus, 2013. "Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 226-244, June.
    4. Glenn Dutcher & Cortney S. Rodet, 2022. "Which two heads are better than one? Uncovering the positive effects of diversity in creative teams," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 884-897, November.
    5. Sophie Hooge & Milena Klasing Chen & Dominique Laousse, 2019. "Managing the emergence of concepts in fuzzy front end: a framework of strategic performance and emerging process of innovation briefs," Post-Print hal-02167857, HAL.
    6. Daniel Feiler & Jordan Tong, 2022. "From Noise to Bias: Overconfidence in New Product Forecasting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4685-4702, June.
    7. Laura J. Kornish & Sharaya M. Jones, 2021. "Raw Ideas in the Fuzzy Front End: Verbosity Increases Perceived Creativity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 1106-1122, November.
    8. Ivan Fedorenko & Pierre Berthon, 2017. "Beyond the expected benefits: unpacking value co-creation in crowdsourcing business models," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(3), pages 183-194, December.
    9. Dr. Edwinah, Amah & Dr. Joy Adanma Mekuri-Ndimele, 2021. "Inclusive Human Resource Management (IHRM) and Innovative Work Behaviour in Telecommunication Industry in Rivers State," Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 5(2), pages 46-54, February.
    10. L. G. Pee, 2016. "Customer co-creation in B2C e-commerce: does it lead to better new products?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 217-243, June.
    11. Guy Parmentier & Séverine Leloarne-Lemaire & Mustapha Belkhouja, 2017. "Female Creativity in Organizations: What is the Impact of Team Composition in Terms of Gender during Ideation Processes? [La creatividad de las mujeres en las organizaciones: ¿Cuál es el impacto de," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01700895, HAL.
    12. Mohsen Jafari Songhori & Madjid Tavana & Takao Terano, 2020. "Product development team formation: effects of organizational- and product-related factors," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 88-122, March.
    13. Viktoria Boss & Robin Kleer & Alexander Vossen, 2017. "Walking Parallel Paths Or Taking The Same Road? The Effect Of Collaborative Incentives In Innovation Contests," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-34, April.
    14. Doran Justin & Ryan Geraldine, 2017. "The role of stimulating employees’ creativity and idea generation in encouraging innovation behaviour in Irish firms," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 36(1), pages 32-48.
    15. Karan Girotra & Serguei Netessine, 2013. "OM Forum —Business Model Innovation for Sustainability," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 537-544, October.
    16. Peter Vogel, 2017. "From Venture Idea to Venture Opportunity," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(6), pages 943-971, November.
    17. Gambardella, Alfonso, 2013. "The economic value of patented inventions: Thoughts and some open questions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 626-633.
    18. Morvarid Rahmani & Karthik Ramachandran, 2021. "Delegating Innovation Projects with Deadline: Committed vs. Flexible Stopping," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6317-6332, October.
    19. Haibo Liu & Jürgen Mihm & Manuel E. Sosa & Manuel E. Sosa, 2018. "Where Do Stars Come From? The Role of Star vs. Nonstar Collaborators in Creative Settings," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1149-1169, December.
    20. Gama, Fábio & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Frishammar, Johan & Wincent, Joakim, 2022. "Exploratory and exploitative capability paths for innovation: A contingency framework for harnessing fuzziness in the front end," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03701434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.