IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03598765.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mobile Interactivity and Perceived Waiting Time : The Role of Cognitive Absorption and Perceived Procedural Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Changqin Yin

    (HUST - Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Wuhan])

  • Ma Huimin

    (HUST - Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Wuhan])

  • Qian Chen

    (HUST - Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Wuhan])

  • Yeming Gong

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Xiaobin Shu

    (Central China Normal University [Wuhan, China])

Abstract

While perceived waiting time can undermine user evaluation and cause application abandonment, there is little scientific research on waiting in mobile applications. This paper incorporates three mobile interactivity features (ubiquitous connectivity, active control, and responsiveness) into the model and examines the mediating role of cognitive absorption and the moderating role of perceived procedural justice between these features and perceived waiting time in a short-waiting application. The researchers empirically examine the model using data from 468 uses of the ride-sharing mobile application. The results reveal that mobile interactivity can directly and indirectly (via cognitive absorption) lead to more tolerance in perceived waiting time. The findings elicit several implications for theories and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Changqin Yin & Ma Huimin & Qian Chen & Yeming Gong & Xiaobin Shu, 2021. "Mobile Interactivity and Perceived Waiting Time : The Role of Cognitive Absorption and Perceived Procedural Justice," Post-Print hal-03598765, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03598765
    DOI: 10.4018/JGIM.20211101.oa27
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03598765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03598765/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4018/JGIM.20211101.oa27?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gohary, Ali & Hamzelu, Bahman & Alizadeh, Hamid, 2016. "Please explain why it happened! How perceived justice and customer involvement affect post co-recovery evaluations: A study of Iranian online shoppers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 127-142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Michael A. & Taylor, Valerie A., 2018. "Marketer requests for positive post-purchase satisfaction evaluations: Consumer depth interview findings," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 218-226.
    2. Yang, Yan & Hu, Jing, 2021. "Self-diminishing effects of awe on consumer forgiveness in service encounters," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Xing, Xinyu & Song, Mengmeng & Duan, Yucong & Mou, Jian, 2022. "Effects of different service failure types and recovery strategies on the consumer response mechanism of chatbots," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Yu Zhang & Bingjia Shao, 2019. "The Effectiveness of Customer Participation and Affective Misforecasting in Online Post-Recovery Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Hazée, Simon & Van Vaerenbergh, Yves & Armirotto, Vincent, 2017. "Co-creating service recovery after service failure: The role of brand equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 101-109.
    6. Chen, Ke & Wu, Zhan & Sharma, Piyush, 2023. "Role of downward versus upward social comparison in service recovery: Testing a mediated moderation model with two empirical studies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Tandon, Anushree & Kaur, Puneet & Bhatt, Yogesh & Mäntymäki, Matti & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Why do people purchase from food delivery apps? A consumer value perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Chakraborty, Debarun & Siddiqui, Aaliyah & Siddiqui, Mujahid & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dash, Ganesh, 2022. "Mobile payment apps filling value gaps: Integrating consumption values with initial trust and customer involvement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Yu Zhang & Bingjia Shao, 2018. "The Effect of Customer Participation Types on Online Recovery Satisfaction: A Mental Accounting Perspective," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Bagherzadeh, Ramin & Rawal, Monika & Wei, Shuqin & Saavedra Torres, Jose Luis, 2020. "The journey from customer participation in service failure to co-creation in service recovery," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    11. Bahri-Ammari, Nedra & Bilgihan, Anil, 2017. "The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on customer retention: An empirical investigation in the mobile telecom industry in Tunisia," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 89-100.
    12. Azzam Rifi & Rania B. Mostafa, 2022. "Brand credibility and customer-based brand equity: a service recovery perspective," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Fang, Shujie & Zhang, Chun & Li, Yaoqi, 2020. "Physical attractiveness of service employees and customer engagement in tourism industry," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Yves Van Vaerenbergh & Simon Hazée & Annelies Costers, 2018. "Customer participation in service recovery: a meta-analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 465-483, December.
    15. Jafarzadeh, Hamed & Tafti, Mahdi & Intezari, Ali & Sohrabi, Babak, 2021. "All's well that ends well: Effective recovery from failures during the delivery phase of e-retailing process," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Zhang, Yu & Yuan, Yafen & Su, Jiafu & Xiao, Yan, 2021. "The effect of employees' politeness strategy and customer membership on customers' perception of co-recovery and online post-recovery satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. Mateus Nagel & Cristiane Pizzutti dos Santos, 2017. "The Relationship Between Satisfaction with Complaint Handling and Repurchase Intentions: Detecting Moderating Influences in E-Tail," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(5), pages 510-527, September.
    18. Ying Kai Liao & Chih Ying Wu & Giang Nu To Truong & Yen Thi Do, 2022. "The Roles of Service Recovery and Perceived Justice on Post-Recovery Satisfaction in M-Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03598765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.