IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03386514.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Violence within organizations in the health and medico-social sector. For a France-Romania comparative analysis
[Violences au sein des organisations du secteur sanitaire et médico-social. Pour une analyse comparée France-Roumanie]

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Carra

    (UA - Université d'Artois, LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Sorin Burlacu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Daniel Faggianelli

    (UBO - Université de Brest, CREAD EA 3875 - Centre de Recherche sur l'Education, les apprentissages et la didactique - UBO - Université de Brest - UR2 - Université de Rennes 2 - IBSHS - Institut Brestois des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société - UBO - Université de Brest)

Abstract

Violence at work constitutes a social problem at the international level and, according to WHO (2002), is a global challenge. In the health and medico-social sector, it is increasingly expressed in political, institutional and professional concern. This is the case in France and Romania. However, the figures which covers this phenomenon in each of these two countries, are they identical? So that's a comparison we're looking at. The aim of this article is to present the theoretical and methodological framework of the comparison, specifying the segments studied, after identifying possible national particularities in the way of apprehending violence in the health and medico-social sector. In order to avoid falling into the trap of ethnocentrism, we choose to construct a definition of violence not from predefined categories, but the experienceof the individual, in this case caregivers, which will be the focus of this comparative research. The thesis of the research is that the experience of violence of the health professionals is related to the specificities of the organization (which requiresto study the social relations of work) and the relation of service (which leads to analyze the Relations between users and professionals), whose transformations are specific to each of the national contexts. The first objective of this research is an objective of knowledge: what is the prevalence of the phenomenon in each of the two countries selected? How is it reflected in each national context? What are the patterns of violence from one country to another? Can we identify common figures? Do national specificities appear? The second objective is explanatory; We will seek to identify the factors by which the experience of professional violence varies. We hypothesize that the experience of violence is all the stronger (at the individual level) and more widespread (at the level of a service, a unit or an institution) than the relationship with the profession of caregivers Is distant from the conditions of practice on the one hand and institutional expectations on the other. We hypothesize that the experience of violence varies according to the type of response the organization gives to violence, the lack of response exacerbating the feeling of violence. Our third hypothesis is that the victim's expression varies in the opposite direction to the sense of institutional and professional recognition of caregivers. In order to understand the caregivers' experience, and in line with the epistemological approach adopted, we will carry out a victimization survey asking the respondents what they experience as violence in the exercise of their profession while collecting data on their profession (work, professional ideology), relations within the service and with users and their families, and data on the ideology), relations within the service and with users and their families, and data on the organization (service, unit, establishment) and its functioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Carra & Sorin Burlacu & Daniel Faggianelli, 2016. "Violence within organizations in the health and medico-social sector. For a France-Romania comparative analysis [Violences au sein des organisations du secteur sanitaire et médico-social. Pour une ," Post-Print hal-03386514, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03386514
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03386514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03386514/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel FAGGIANELLI & Sorin BURLACU & Cécile CARRA, 2018. "Victimization Of Health Professionals In Bucharest Service Relations And Social Work Relationships," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(30), pages 109-126, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    report to the profession; France-Romania; victimization survey; Experience of violence; health professionals; comparative analysis; expérience de violence; professionnels de santé; analyse comparée; France-Roumanie; enquête de victimation; rapport au métier; enquête de victimation I18; I12; I19;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03386514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.