IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03347042.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Citizens from 13 countries share similar preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocation priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond Duch

    (Nuffield College - University of Oxford)

  • Laurence Roope

    (University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital [Oxford University Hospital])

  • Mara Violato

    (University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital [Oxford University Hospital])

  • Mf Becerra

    (UCHILE - Universidad de Chile = University of Chile [Santiago])

  • T. Robinson

    (Durham University)

  • Jean-François Bonnefon

    (TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Jorge Friedman

    (UCHILE - Universidad de Chile = University of Chile [Santiago])

  • Peter Loewen

    (University of Toronto)

  • P. Mamidi

    (Ashoka University)

  • Alessia Melegaro

    (Bocconi University [Milan, Italy])

  • M. Blanco

    (Universidad del Rosario [Bogota])

  • J. Vargas

    (Universidad del Rosario [Bogota])

  • J. Seither

    (Universidad del Rosario [Bogota])

  • P. Candio

    (John Radcliffe Hospital [Oxford University Hospital], University of Birmingham [Birmingham])

  • Ag Cruz

    (University of Oxford)

  • X. Hua

    (The University of MelbourneParkville, VIC, Australia.)

  • Adrian Barnett

    (QUT - Queensland University of Technology [Brisbane])

  • Philip Clarke

    (University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital [Oxford University Hospital], The University of MelbourneParkville, VIC, Australia.)

Abstract

How does the public want a COVID-19 vaccine to be allocated? We conducted a conjoint experiment asking 15,536 adults in 13 countries to evaluate 248,576 profiles of potential vaccine recipients that varied randomly on five attributes. Our sample includes diverse countries from all continents. The results suggest that in addition to giving priority to health workers and to those at high risk, the public favours giving priority to a broad range of key workers and to those on lower incomes. These preferences are similar across respondents of different education levels, incomes, and political ideologies, as well as across most surveyed countries. The public favoured COVID-19 vaccines being allocated solely via government programs, but were highly polarized in some developed countries on whether taking a vaccine should be mandatory. There is a consensus among the public on many aspects of COVID-19 vaccination which needs to be taken into account when developing and communicating roll-out strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond Duch & Laurence Roope & Mara Violato & Mf Becerra & T. Robinson & Jean-François Bonnefon & Jorge Friedman & Peter Loewen & P. Mamidi & Alessia Melegaro & M. Blanco & J. Vargas & J. Seither & P, 2021. "Citizens from 13 countries share similar preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocation priorities," Post-Print hal-03347042, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03347042
    DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2026382118
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03347042v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03347042v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1073/pnas.2026382118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barceló, Joan & Sheen, Greg Chih-Hsin & Tung, Hans H. & Wu, Wen-Chin, 2022. "Vaccine nationalism among the public: A cross-country experimental evidence of own-country bias towards COVID-19 vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    2. Luyten, Jeroen & Beutels, Philippe & Vandermeulen, Corinne & Kessels, Roselinde, 2022. "Social preferences for adopting new vaccines in the national immunization program: A discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    3. Candio, Paolo & Violato, Mara & Clarke, Philip M & Duch, Raymond & Roope, Laurence SJ, 2023. "Prevalence, predictors and reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Results of a global online survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    COVID-19; Vaccinations; Public health; Public opinion;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03347042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.