IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03280658.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unit representation of semiorders II: The general case

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Bouyssou

    (LAMSADE - Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Marc Pirlot

    (UMONS - Université de Mons / University of Mons)

Abstract

Necessary and suffcient conditions under which semiorders on uncountable sets can be represented by a real-valued function and a constant threshold are known. We show that the proof strategy that we used for constructing representations in the case of denumerable semiorders can be adapted to the uncountable case. We use it to give an alternative proof of the existence of strict unit representations. A direct adaptation of the same strategy allows us to prove a characterization of the semiorders that admit a nonstrict representation.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2021. "Unit representation of semiorders II: The general case," Post-Print hal-03280658, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03280658
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102568
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03280658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03280658/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avraham Beja & Itzhak Gilboa, 1989. "Numerical Representations of Imperfectly Ordered Preferences (A Unified Geometric Exposition," Discussion Papers 836, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    2. Marc Pirlot, 1990. "Minimal representation of a semiorder," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/165863, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Fuad Aleskerov & Denis Bouyssou & Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-34183-3, June.
    4. Oloriz, Esteban & Candeal, Juan Carlos & Indurain, Esteban, 1998. "Representability of Interval Orders," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 219-227, January.
    5. Beardon, Alan F. & Candeal, Juan C. & Herden, Gerhard & Indurain, Esteban & Mehta, Ghanshyam B., 2002. "The non-existence of a utility function and the structure of non-representable preference relations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 17-38, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abrísqueta, Francisco J. & Candeal, Juan C. & Induráin, Esteban & Zudaire, Margarita, 2009. "Scott-Suppes representability of semiorders: Internal conditions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 245-261, March.
    2. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "Unit representation of semiorders II: The general case," Working Papers hal-02918017, HAL.
    3. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2021. "Unit representation of semiorders I: Countable sets," Post-Print hal-03280649, HAL.
    4. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "Unit representation of semiorders I: Countable sets," Working Papers hal-02918005, HAL.
    5. Candeal, Juan Carlos & Indurain, Esteban & Zudaire, Margarita, 2002. "Numerical representability of semiorders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 61-77, January.
    6. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2004. "Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: Traces, Dominance, and Numerical Representations," Post-Print hal-00004104, HAL.
    7. Nuh Aygün Dalkıran & Furkan Yıldız, 2021. "Another Characterization of Expected Scott-Suppes Utility Representation," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 177-193.
    8. Dziewulski, Paweł, 2020. "Just-noticeable difference as a behavioural foundation of the critical cost-efficiency index," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Pawel Dziewulski, 2018. "Just-noticeable difference as a behavioural foundation of the critical cost-efficiency," Economics Series Working Papers 848, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    10. Pawel Dziewulski, 2021. "A comprehensive revealed preference approach to approximate utility maximisation," Working Paper Series 0621, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    11. Pawel Dziewulski, 2016. "Eliciting the just-noticeable difference," Economics Series Working Papers 798, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    12. Schwartz, Thomas, 2014. "Choice functions and bounded rationality," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 14-18.
    13. Argenziano, Rossella & Gilboa, Itzhak, 2017. "Psychophysical foundations of the Cobb–Douglas utility function," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 21-23.
    14. Bernard Monjardet, 2005. "Modèles ordinaux de préférences," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b05097, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    15. Juan P. Aguilera & Levent Ülkü, 2017. "On the maximization of menu-dependent interval orders," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 357-366, February.
    16. Dubra Juan & Echenique Federico, 2001. "Monotone Preferences over Information," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Xiaosheng Mu, 2021. "Sequential Choice with Incomplete Preferences," Working Papers 2021-35, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    18. Gilboa, Itzhak & Lapson, Robert, 1995. "Aggregation of Semiorders: Intransitive Indifference Makes a Difference," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(1), pages 109-126, January.
    19. Alcantud, Jose C.R., 2006. "Maximality with or without binariness: Transfer-type characterizations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 182-191, March.
    20. Marley, A. A. J., 2002. "Random utility models and their applications: recent developments," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 289-302, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03280658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.