IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02612617.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le choix du modèle de régulation des Fintech : entre sandbox et soundbox

Author

Listed:
  • Gurvan Branellec

    (Brest Business School)

  • Ji-Yong Lee

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

La révolution technologique digitale touche l'ensemble des métiers de la finance. Elle conduit les régulateurs à encadrer les nouveaux acteurs qui ne cessent de gagner en popularité. Les pouvoirs publics sont confrontés à des impératifs complexes à concilier. D'un côté, ils souhaitent ouvrir le cadre juridique traditionnel afin d'intensifier la concurrence en permettant aux start-up Fintech de proposer des services financiers aux particuliers et aux entreprises. D'un autre côté, il est nécessaire de contrôler ces activités à risque et protéger ainsi le consommateur. La France est donc confrontée au défi de la construction d'un cadre juridique à même d'éviter de brider l'innovation des Fintech. Celles-ci étant en plein essor en Angleterre et aux États-Unis, il est pertinent de s'interroger sur la possibilité d'une prise en compte par la France des modèles réglementaires en vigueur dans ces pays, à défaut de mettre en place une réglementation différente. Notre travail tente d'apporter une contribution à cette problématique par le biais d'une conciliation entre la littérature juridique anglo-saxonne (anglaise et américaine) et celle en économie financière.

Suggested Citation

  • Gurvan Branellec & Ji-Yong Lee, 2019. "Le choix du modèle de régulation des Fintech : entre sandbox et soundbox," Post-Print hal-02612617, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02612617
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://audencia.hal.science/hal-02612617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://audencia.hal.science/hal-02612617/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sylvie Cieply & Anne-Laure Le Nadant, 2016. "Le crowdfunding : modèle alternatif de financement ou généralisation du modèle de marché pour les start-up et les PME ?," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(2), pages 255-272.
    2. Michel Aglietta, 2011. "Risque systémique et politique macroprudentielle : une nouvelle responsabilité des banques centrales," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(1), pages 193-204.
    3. Ajay Agrawal & Christian Catalini & Avi Goldfarb, 2014. "Some Simple Economics of Crowdfunding," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(1), pages 63-97.
    4. Michel Aglietta, 2011. "Risque systémique et politique macroprudentielle : une nouvelle responsabilité des banques centrales," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 101(1), pages 193-203.
    5. Hubert de Vauplane, 2015. "Les nouveaux acteurs de la finance," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(2), pages 27-35.
    6. Olivier Klein, 2015. "Banque et nouvelles technologies : la nouvelle donne," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(4), pages 17-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilles, Philippe & Huchet, Nicolas & Gauvin, Marie-Sophie, 2012. "Politique monétaire, choix de portefeuille du secteur bancaire et canal de la prise de risque," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 88(2), pages 175-196, Juin.
    2. Mustapha Achibane & Imane Allam, 2019. "Banking risk management between the prudential and the operational approaches : case of Moroccan banks ACHIBANE Mustapha [La gestion des risques bancaires entre l'approche prudentielle et l'approch," Post-Print hal-02901066, HAL.
    3. Wolfgang Pointner & Burkhard Raunig, 2018. "A primer on peer-to-peer lending: immediate financial intermediation in practice," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/18, pages 36-51.
    4. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    5. Wesemann, Henrik & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "A whole new world: Counterintuitive crowdfunding insights for female founders," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    6. Srikant Devaraj & Pankaj C Patel, 2016. "Influence of number of backers, goal amount, and project duration on meeting funding goals of crowdfunding projects," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(2), pages 1242-1249.
    7. Chul Kim & P. K. Kannan & Michael Trusov & Andrea Ordanini, 2020. "Modeling Dynamics in Crowdfunding," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 339-365, March.
    8. Pastwa, Anna M. & Shrestha, Prabal & Thewissen, James & Torsin, Wouter, 2021. "Unpacking the black box of ICO white papers: a topic modeling approach," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2021018, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    9. repec:zbw:bofitp:2019_022 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Appio, Francesco Paolo & Leone, Daniele & Platania, Federico & Schiavone, Francesco, 2020. "Why are rewards not delivered on time in rewards-based crowdfunding campaigns? An empirical exploration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Tuo Gladys & Yi Feng & Sarpong Solomon & Wang Wenxin, 2020. "The Second Round Resource Acquisition of Entrepreneurial Crowdfunded Ventures: The Relevance of Campaign and Project Implementation Performance Outcomes," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Kate Gasparro & Ashby Monk, 2020. "Demystifying “localness†of infrastructure assets: Crowdfunders as local intermediaries for global investors," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 878-897, August.
    13. Jung, Eunjun & Lee, Changjun & Hwang, Junseok, 2022. "Effective strategies to attract crowdfunding investment based on the novelty of business ideas," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Evila Piva & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2018. "Human capital signals and entrepreneurs’ success in equity crowdfunding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 667-686, October.
    15. Zunino, Diego & van Praag, Mirjam C. & Dushnitsky, Gary, 2017. "Badge of Honor or Scarlet Letter? Unpacking Investors' Judgment of Entrepreneurs' Past Failure," IZA Discussion Papers 11017, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Tafesse, Wondwesen, 2021. "Communicating crowdfunding campaigns: How message strategy, vivid media use and product type influence campaign success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 252-263.
    17. Sylvain Dejean, 2019. "The role of distance and social networks in the geography of crowdfunding: evidence from France," Working Papers hal-01645147, HAL.
    18. Fatima Shuwaikh & Mathew Hughes & Souad Brinette & Sabrina Khemiri, 2024. "Investment decisions under uncertainty: Corporate venture capital as a real option," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2452-2471, April.
    19. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2015-036 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Andreas Dietrich & Reto Rey, 2020. "What Matters to Individual Investors: Price Setting in Online Auctions of P2P Consumer Loans," Papers 2003.11347, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    21. Roland Strausz, 2017. "A Theory of Crowdfunding: A Mechanism Design Approach with Demand Uncertainty and Moral Hazard," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1430-1476, June.
    22. Ajay Agrawal & Christian Catalini & Avi Goldfarb, 2015. "Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 253-274, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02612617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.