IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02312369.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Presenting Findings from Qualitative Research: One Size Does Not Fit All!

Author

Listed:
  • Trish Reay

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Asma Zafar
  • Pedro Monteiro
  • Vern Glaser

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors explore the state of our field in terms of ways to present qualitative findings. The authors analyze all articles based on qualitative research methods published in the Academy of Management Journal from 2010 to 2017 and supplement this by informally surveying colleagues about their "favorite" qualitative authors. As a result, the authors identify five ways of presenting qualitative findings in research articles. The authors suggest that each approach has advantages as well as limitations, and that the type of data and theorizing is an important consideration in determining the most appropriate approach for the presentation of findings. The authors hope that by identifying these approaches, they enrich the way authors, reviewers, and editors approach the presentation of qualitative findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Trish Reay & Asma Zafar & Pedro Monteiro & Vern Glaser, 2019. "Presenting Findings from Qualitative Research: One Size Does Not Fit All!," Post-Print hal-02312369, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jerzy Kociatkiewicz & Monika Kostera, 2023. "Longing as learning, learning as longing: insights and improvisations in a year of disrupted studies," Post-Print hal-03735974, HAL.
    2. Magnani, Giovanna & Gioia, Denny, 2023. "Using the Gioia Methodology in international business and entrepreneurship research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    3. A. Rebecca Reuber & Eileen Fischer, 2022. "Putting qualitative international business research in context(s)," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 27-38, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.